Should the Ravens show interest in David Garrard?

FootballBaltimore RavensDavid GarrardPittsburgh SteelersTyrod TaylorJoe FlaccoJacksonville Jaguars

The Ravens enter Sunday's showdown against the Steelers with two quarterbacks on their active roster: Joe Flacco, a four-year veteran who has never missed a start, and Tyrod Taylor, an untested rookie who is coping with a minor shoulder injury. Hunter Cantwell is running with the practice squad, so he doesn't count.

Despite throwing three interceptions in the preseason, Taylor did enough to win the trust of the coaching staff and keep the team from bringing in a more seasoned quarterback. It also helped his cause that the pickings on the open market were slim. But on Tuesday, a viable option presented itself in the form of David Garrard.

The Jaguars unexpectedly cut Garrard, opting to go with Luke McCown and Blaine Gabbert. They said it was a performance-based move, but they also saved $9 million by letting the 2009 Pro Bowl selection go.

Garrard was mostly mediocre as a starter, but if he signs on with a team as a second-stringer, he would be among the best backup quarterbacks in the NFL. The Ravens were in a similar situation last season when they signed former Rams quarterback Marc Bulger to give them depth at the position and peace of mind, too. Might they consider bringing in Garrard as insurance for Flacco?

“Don't be surprised if [the] Ravens take a hard look at David Garrard, who is expected to be released by [the] Jaguars,” our Ravens beat reporter Jamison Hensley wrote on Twitter after the Garrard news broke. “[The] Ravens need [a] veteran backup.”

They were the first team that ESPN’s John Clayton mentioned as potential suitors. Garrard’s agent told The Florida Times-Union on Tuesday that three teams had already inquired about Garrard’s services. Were the Ravens one? Who knows?

The Ravens don’t have much cap space, so money could be an issue if they do show interest in Garrard. If the interest is mutual and a deal is fiscally doable, why wouldn’t the Ravens bring him in?

I like Taylor’s potential, and maybe he would do just fine filling in for Flacco, but adding a proven player such as Garrard -- whether he is No. 2 or No. 3 on the depth chart -- is a luxury worth splurging on. He has won a playoff game, against Ben Roethlisberger and the Steelers in Pittsburgh, no less. Sure, if Flacco gets hurt, the team’s title dreams will be trashed. Garrard may be able to salvage them.

Your turn: Should the Ravens show interest in David Garrard, or should they stand pat with Joe Flacco and Tyrod Taylor?

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
FootballBaltimore RavensDavid GarrardPittsburgh SteelersTyrod TaylorJoe FlaccoJacksonville Jaguars
  • Are the Ravens better than they were last season?
    Are the Ravens a better team than they were a year ago?

    The Ravens continued to tinker with their roster over the weekend, signing Pro Bowl center Andre Gurode to bolster the offensive line. It was the third significant roster move the Ravens have made since the start of the preseason; they also addressed areas of concern by bringing in wideout...

  • Is anyone actually excited about the Baltimore Grand Prix?
    Is anyone actually excited about the Baltimore Grand Prix?

    We're two days removed from the inaugural Baltimore Grand Prix, and I haven't talked to one person who is looking forward to the big IndyCar race. Granted, I don't know every single person in Baltimore, but it seems the consensus is that this costly event is a logistical...

  • Which Ravens player has the most to lose Thursday night?
    Which Ravens player has the most to lose Thursday night?

    Thursday night's preseason game against the Falcons won't be all that entertaining for Ravens fans who want to see Ray Lewis, Joe Flacco and Ed Reed play four quarters of football. But it's a critical game for players on the roster bubble, and for the "camp body" guys...

Comments
Loading