When William "Billy" Kerr and his wife, Kerri, bought their 80-year-old bungalow on Anneslie Road near Towson this spring, property taxes were not a major concern.
"When you're sitting there at the closing table, you don't question details," Billy Kerr said. Compared with the $356,500 price of their home - nearly double its last sale price in 1998 - the local taxes seemed "a relatively small amount."
But that was before the Kerrs learned they owed Baltimore County $3,038.94 in taxes, while their next-door neighbors, Daniel and Mary "Grace" Bigelow, had a tax bill for $1,968.27 on a nearly identical house. The Bigelows bought their house six years ago for $115,000.
All over Maryland, buyers of new homes are in the same boat, thanks to sharply higher home prices and a state tax law that gives existing homeowners a break.
The assessment caps that keep taxes low come off when a home changes hands. That means that in parts of Baltimore City and Anne Arundel, Howard and Baltimore counties - as in other real estate hot spots - homeowners in the same neighborhood may get sharply different tax bills on nearly identical homes, depending on when they bought. The current system locks that gap in place until the homes with the lower assessments are sold.
Maryland attorneys general have issued opinions for decades arguing that the system is unconstitutional because it fails to treat all homeowners equally. No one has ever tested that theory with a lawsuit, however.
In California, a tax revolt in 1978 sharply limited property tax increases for existing homes - creating tax gaps in that state as well. In other states with soaring property values, assessment caps, tax rebates, breaks for seniors and other strategies also can create disparities in tax bills.
"Everyone's got a different scenario, and each scenario can be unique," said Bert Waisanen, a tax policy expert at the National Conference of State Legislatures in Denver.
Homeowners in Maryland - and their elected representatives - are protected from sudden jumps in their local property tax bills by a multi-tiered system that continually phases in higher home assessments over three-year spans. More important, that system limits annual increases through assessment caps.
When the law first passed the General Assembly in 1977, it included an assessment cap limiting increases to a maximum of 15 percent a year. After a property tax revolt toppled incumbents all over the state in 1990, the General Assembly lowered the cap to 10 percent, and gave local governments the power to go even lower.
Ten of Maryland's 24 jurisdictions have done that. Baltimore City and Baltimore County both have 4 percent caps; Howard County has a 5 percent cap, and Anne Arundel caps increases at 2 percent. Talbot County essentially froze increases with a zero cap.
But when a home changes hands, the cap comes off temporarily, allowing taxes to rise to a level closer to the home's retail value.
Robert Young, associate director of the state Department of Assessments and Taxation, said a tax cap is intended to protect longtime homeowners, not new homebuyers. The assumption, Young said, is that "somebody who is buying the home has the income" to pay the taxes.
Some buyers and even some tax-reform advocates are outraged by the difference in tax bills.
Issue of fairness
"It's definitely not fair," said David Boyd, co-founder of Property Taxpayers United, a Baltimore County tax-protest group formed after sharply higher assessments in 1989. "We're willing to pay our share, but this is not right, and it's got to be corrected."
But James Oglethorpe, a leader of the Howard County Taxpayers Association, takes the opposite view.
"I think it's fair because people move into a home and they understand that's the rule. They're part of the increased demand for all the services," he said. "If they're not aware, they should be."
House of Delegates Speaker Michael E. Busch of Anne Arundel County said all tax systems need periodic adjustments. "From time to time they become inequitable," he said.
Still, he defends the tax cap.
"The whole idea was not to force people out of their communities," Busch said. Removing the caps when a house changes hands "is fair because the people coming in have made a self-determination they can afford to buy a home."
Local budget officials say the impact of higher revenue from home sales is uncertain, but probably minimal. In Howard County, for example, only about 5 percent or 6 percent of homes are sold in a given year, said Raymond S. Wacks, who for 30 years was Howard County's budget officer and now is Baltimore's budget director.
But officials are well aware of the impact tax caps can have on the state coffers. In fiscal 2005, which ended June 30, state assessment officials estimated a total loss of $172.4 million in local property tax revenues because of the caps.
Still, state lawmakers were clear about what they were trying to achieve when they enacted the cap, said former state assessments director Ronald W. Wineholt: "The General Assembly was trying to protect existing homeowners from being taxed out of their homes."
That's small comfort to buyers at a time of record real estate prices, however.
Danae and Edward G. Grigsby paid $599,900 in April for their traditional saltbox house in Glenelg, in western Howard County - and they felt lucky to get it, Danae Grigsby said.
"It's really insane," she said. "I would have liked to have spent less, but what really drew me to Howard County was the schools. I'm willing to pay a little more for a good school."
The Grigsbys' tax bill was $5,935.97, compared with bills ranging from $4,109 to $4,992 for similar homes nearby on Penn Cross Court where the existing owners enjoy assessment cap protection.
'We weren't aware'
All residential tax bills are available online through local government Web sites. But the Kerrs, of Anneslie, didn't know about the tax gap until a reporter's call.
"Wow," was Billy Kerr's first reaction when told the difference in his and the Bigelows' tax bill. "When we got the house, we got the multiple listing sheet, which printed taxes the previous owners paid. We weren't aware it was going up."
His next-door neighbor, Grace Bigelow, was sympathetic but also happy with her own tax bill.
"I definitely feel lucky," she said.
Henry A. Strohminger III, president of the Greater Baltimore Board of Realtors, said the board does not direct Realtors to tell homebuyers what their taxes will be after purchase.
"It really comes down to the professionalism of the individual brokers," he said. Some buyers said they were told about higher taxes, while others were not.
In Baltimore, Edith Colgan and Troy Trahan owe $3,632.82 on their 75-year-old, semi-detached stone-and-stucco house on Keswick Road, near the Rotunda. Their next-door neighbor's bill was $2,959.30.
"I was actually really upset when we got the tax bill," she said, adding that their mortgage company increased their monthly escrow payment $150 a month to catch up.
"We were not prepared for this huge hike," she said, adding that they had to pay more than $4,000 for roof and plumbing repairs to the house when they moved in. "For us, it [taxes] hurts right now," she said.
Just outside Annapolis, Margaret M. Griffin bought a three-story townhouse on Samuel Chase Way in February for $418,000. The same townhouse sold for $225,000 four years ago, and $160,000 when new, in 1997.
Griffin's house, like the Kerrs' and the Colgan-Trahan's, is in an area newly reassessed by the state for this tax year - boosting taxes even more. Her Anne Arundel County tax bill was $2,757.91, compared with the $2,134.56 a neighbor two doors away pays.
"I knew there's a big difference, but I didn't think it was so big," she said. "We all have the same house. I don't think its fair. I only moved around the block."
In Ellicott City, 29-year-old John Bland bought a four-year-old townhouse on Halcyon Court, just off U.S. 40 near Ridge Road, in February for $300,000. His tax bill from Howard County is $4,141.38, compared with the $2,621 bill received by neighbors Mark Frey and Jade Vonhawley-Frey.
"Of course it bothers me to pay more taxes than my neighbors. I put it down as a big bummer. There's so much in real estate that's out of control," he said.
Vonhawley-Frey sympathized but is happy about her lower bill.
"I feel both lucky, and bad for him," she said. "I don't think it's right that this happens. I don't think they should be paying more than we pay," she said about home buyers.
Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times