New rules must require all farmers do their fair share to clean up the bay

Regarding your recent commentary on animal waste and pollution in the Chesapeake Bay, I would like to point out that agriculture is not a monolithic industry uniformly opposed to the regulation of harmful nutrients that foul the Chesapeake Bay ("The biggest problem," Feb. 20).

I am a farmer in Frederick County who took the time from my operation to go to Annapolis Tuesday to testify in support of legislation to require better management of farm animal manure and sewage. I raise sheep, goats, hogs and poultry whose manure would be subject to the new rules.

Our farm is bordered by Tom's Creek, which feeds into the Monocacy River and which ultimately drains into the Chesapeake Bay. Our watershed is one of many in the region that suffers from excessive runoff of nutrients from agriculture.

We follow voluntary best management practices recommended by the state, and although we get some financial and technical assistance, implementing these best practices still costs us time, money and the use of land adjacent to creeks and drainage swales that we have to take out of production.

It is frustrating to do all of this only to drive off my farm and see cows standing in the creek, barren fields without any cover crops, and farmers spreading manure on frozen ground in violation of state regulations.

Worse yet is to leave my driveway on warm, wet winter days and see black/brown water running into the drainage ditch along the road, which then dumps into the creek. The soil in our part of the county is orange, not black/brown, so this is not sediment coming off our fields.

Taxpayers are footing the bill to fund best management practices on farms across the state. The problem is you cannot have a patchwork in which some farmers try to prevent the runoff of nutrients into the bay, while others do nothing. We're all on the same body of water, and we will never clean it up unless we all do our fair share.

Voluntary, incentive-based approaches have failed. We've tried that strategy for more than 30 years now. The reality is speed limits are for speeders, not for people who never drive above 55. Rules are for people who aren't following them. Right now, we have a lot of farmers who are not following the rules.

If we are serious about cleaning up the bay, what we need are a set of uniform — and uniformly enforced — rules for all farmers to abide by.

William Morrow, Emmitsburg

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • What about Pa. manure?
    What about Pa. manure?

    On an almost recurring basis lately, The Sun has devoted itself to bringing to everyone's attention the Eastern Shore poultry industry's polluted runoff flowing into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13). Attention should be directed to the Amish...

  • New rules needed to protect Eastern Shore waterways

    After talking about it for years, Maryland finally has proposed long-overdue regulations on phosphorous pollution from animal manure in the Chesapeake Bay ("Hogan vows to fight farm pollution rules," Dec. 8).

  • Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Dan Rodricks' arguments for protecting the Chesapeake Bay from pollution from chicken farms could have been even stronger ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

  • Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup
    Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup

    Senators Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin, along with Rep. Steny Hoyer, deserve our thanks for securing funding in the recent omnibus appropriations bill to keep Maryland on track to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay and its rivers and streams ("For better or worse, spending bill passes," Dec. 15).

  • Rodricks wrong on bay pollution

    It is time for those writing for The Sun's editorial pages to check their facts. Columnist Dan Rodricks writes that poultry farmers are allowing their chicken manure to run into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13.

  • Chicken industry threatens all other bay businesses

    Dan Rodricks' column on Gov.-elect Larry Hogan and the Chesapeake Bay missed an important fact: Mr. Hogan's pro-poultry industry comments and pledges are actually deeply hurtful to most Eastern Shore businesses ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

  • Compost chicken manure, don't burn it

    Dan Rodricks' recent column urged the new governor to get a large-scale poultry waste incinerator built on the Eastern Shore ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13). This awful idea has been floated for 15 years now and has gone nowhere despite an array of government...

  • Rodricks' definition of a 'green governor' is way off

    Columnist Dan Rodricks' definition of a "green governor" is way off the mark. There is nothing green about a poultry waste incinerator, which Mr. Rodricks is urging Gov.-elect Larry Hogan to fast-track on the Eastern Shore ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

Comments
Loading