For the worst of the worst, the death penalty is still needed

Since capital punishment is an option, not a requirement, it should not be ended ("Death penalty repeal moves forward," March 14).

Instead, it should remain available for really heinous behavior — such as the Washington state man who was picked up by his grandparents on his release from prison, went to their house to celebrate and then murdered them both.

If not the death penalty what does such a person deserve?

Anne Hackney, Parkton

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • Don't lock up children forever
      Don't lock up children forever

      Sen. James Brochin and Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger recently asked whether Maryland would break its promises to victims' families by eliminating life-without-parole sentences for youth under 18. The answer: No ("Will Maryland go back on its word?" March 18).

    • Bring back the death penalty in Md.
      Bring back the death penalty in Md.

      Baltimore's very own "Public Enemy No. 1" has been sentenced to life plus 240 years for a double murder ("Killer gets life plus 240 years, flips off top prosecutor," March 24).

    • Baltimore County is still in the dark ages on the death penalty
      Baltimore County is still in the dark ages on the death penalty

      Some years ago I took a course during which the subject of racist juries in Baltimore County was discussed. I had believed that we had come a long way from those Neanderthal days until I read the op-ed by State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and professor Richard Vatz in which they attempt to...

    • Choose life and mercy — even for heinous crimes
      Choose life and mercy — even for heinous crimes

      While Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard Vatz have outlined many secular reasons for reinstating the death penalty ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6), I suggest that we let dead dogs lie and that we let the death...

    • Shellenberger and Vatz make a weak case for the death penalty
      Shellenberger and Vatz make a weak case for the death penalty

      Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard Vatz present the oft-heard argument in favor of reinstating capital punishment in Maryland ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6). They do not, however, present a compelling argument...

    • O'Malley overrode the public's will on the death penalty
      O'Malley overrode the public's will on the death penalty

      Good article regarding reinstating capital punishment in our state ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6). I agree that it was a big mistake ending it. I feel that the majority want to have the death penalty option, but Gov. Martin O'Malley has his own agenda, and the public be...

    • Killing each other won't make us safer
      Killing each other won't make us safer

      Reading Scott Shellenberger's and Richard E. Vatz's pleas for a reinstatement of the death penalty in Maryland reminds me of a proverbial ditty my mother was fond of during my childhood ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • The death penalty is dead; let's move on
      The death penalty is dead; let's move on

      Each one of the arguments raised in Scott Shellenberger and Richard E. Vatz's recent op-ed calling for reinstating the death penalty in Maryland was considered during the debate on capital punishment ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    Comments
    Loading