Coddling murderers is cruel to victims' families

In response to Michael Dresser's recent front page article ("Death row: Should they die for their crimes?," Feb. 10) it shows just how desperate, devious, disillusioned, and devoted The Sun, liberal journalists like Mr. Dresser and the rest of the Gov. Martin O'Malley-loving, liberal left-wing, drive-by media are when it comes to protecting, pacifying and proficiently making these murdering scum of the earth animals out to be "human" just like us.

As for Mr. Dresser, he is well-known for his far-left-leaning liberal bias in his reporting on transportation, education and Maryland's liberal traffic laws. So it doesn't come as a surprise to anyone with common sense that this "nonsense" article was in line with his and the newspaper's bleeding heart liberal idiocy and ideology.

These animals are a waste of taxpayer money. Meanwhile, the families and loved ones of the innocent victims are left with nothing but heartache, sorrow and no form of closure or justice. Also, they receive no repayment for the loss of life of the victim who was murdered by these animals from them or their families in restitution.

Here's what happens when these animals receive life without parole. First, the sentence eventually gets reduced with good behavior. They get "three hots and a cot" — a bed and three meals a day as well as a chance to earn a GED. There's cable and satellite television (to learn how to murder in prison and get away with it, perhaps), and a chance to learn a trade other than murder.

There are workouts in the prison gym (the added strength will help them become more proficient at murder), free health care, free access to an attorney to help them with their rights as murderers, perhaps get a single room if they are determined to be a danger to the other animals, and finally, to have friends like Governor O'Malley and the other liberal Democrats showing them "compassion" and standing up for their "cause."

So there you have it, Should they die for their crimes? Yes, just let the those who have lost loved ones know when they get the "cruel and inhuman lethal injection" mixture set to the correct dose so they can be there when it's time to witness these animals die.

Gary Dziwulski, Bel Air

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • Baltimore County is still in the dark ages on the death penalty
      Baltimore County is still in the dark ages on the death penalty

      Some years ago I took a course during which the subject of racist juries in Baltimore County was discussed. I had believed that we had come a long way from those Neanderthal days until I read the op-ed by State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and professor Richard Vatz in which they attempt to...

    • Keep the death penalty abolished
      Keep the death penalty abolished

      I find it amazing that Del. Pat McDonough feels that reinstating the death penalty demands his time and resources as a priority in our state despite the numerous more pressing issues ("Del. McDonough seeks to restore death penalty in some cases," Jan. 26). He references two recent police...

    • Shellenberger and Vatz make a weak case for the death penalty
      Shellenberger and Vatz make a weak case for the death penalty

      Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard Vatz present the oft-heard argument in favor of reinstating capital punishment in Maryland ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6). They do not, however, present a compelling argument...

    • O'Malley overrode the public's will on the death penalty
      O'Malley overrode the public's will on the death penalty

      Good article regarding reinstating capital punishment in our state ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6). I agree that it was a big mistake ending it. I feel that the majority want to have the death penalty option, but Gov. Martin O'Malley has his own agenda, and the public be...

    • Killing each other won't make us safer
      Killing each other won't make us safer

      Reading Scott Shellenberger's and Richard E. Vatz's pleas for a reinstatement of the death penalty in Maryland reminds me of a proverbial ditty my mother was fond of during my childhood ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • The death penalty is dead; let's move on
      The death penalty is dead; let's move on

      Each one of the arguments raised in Scott Shellenberger and Richard E. Vatz's recent op-ed calling for reinstating the death penalty in Maryland was considered during the debate on capital punishment ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • Who says innocent people are never executed?
      Who says innocent people are never executed?

      It's ironic that your newspaper should publish a letter from our most ignorant apologists for the death penalty the same week that the Innocence Project freed yet another death row inmate from being wrongfully executed ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • A death penalty rebuttal, point by point
      A death penalty rebuttal, point by point

      It was good of Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard E. Vatz to present their best arguments for reinstating the death penalty in Maryland — or anywhere else, I suppose ("Reinstate the death penalty, Maryland," Jan. 7). Let's see...

    Comments
    Loading