Fix infrastructure but leave gas tax alone

The Maryland legislative pre-session gas tax drumbeats have certainly begun in earnest, as your recent editorial substantiates ("Pump up the economy," Nov. 25). Not much has changed regarding increasing the gas tax from our or our customers' perspective, the motoring public. Gas prices are still extremely high, and our economy is still in struggle mode. Volatility of gas prices still exists and the brief respite at $3.50 a gallon — if you consider $3.50 a bargain — could quickly be erased.

During the last regular General Assembly session and even during the special sessions, the cry to increase the gas tax was that more revenue would create jobs. That did not seem to resonate well with legislators. We think that while some jobs will be created, the burden on consumers far outweighs any jobs benefit and, in fact, more than likely more jobs will be lost than gained. Taking $500 million to $800 million out of consumers pockets and then putting some back in the form of a few jobs to us does not seem to add up!

So now the mantra is infrastructure. We need more gas tax revenue to improve and repair our aging infrastructure, but that assumes that the funds collected will be used for that purpose. Government spends more than 50 percent of the revenue collected for transportation just on mass transit, with most of those funds going to mass transit operating costs. Not one but two mass transit systems that only serve 4-to-5 percent of the state's population. Is this fact really going to change? What are the state's priorities? It certainly has not been improving our highways and roads!

While our state budget and money poured into mass transit increase substantially every year, highway transportation revenue is diverted to other uses. Over the last few years, close to $1 billion has been diverted and not paid back. This equates to almost a 10-cents-per-gallon tax increase.

While gas tax advocates and some legislators are focused on increasing the gas tax as the only way to get more revenue (for what purpose we are not sure), other alternatives and resetting of the state's transportation priorities must be considered. We don't see an easy quick fix, but the time to start thinking about different alternatives and protecting the transportation revenue for its intended purpose is upon us.

Motorists pay well over 60 percent of the total funds that are collected and should be dedicated to the Transportation Trust Fund. Highway users are already paying more than their fair share!

Pete Horrigan, Arnold

The writer is president of the Mid-Atlantic Petroleum Distributors Association.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • How to fix Md.'s aging infrastructure
      How to fix Md.'s aging infrastructure

      Recent Sun articles and editorials have pointed the way forward for Maryland's aging infrastructure ("States scramble as federal highway funding erodes," Feb. 21).

    • Shouldn't Md. already have been inspecting aging bridges?
      Shouldn't Md. already have been inspecting aging bridges?

      The top transportation official in the state has ordered an immediate inspection of 27 aging bridges. This announcement comes after a slab of concrete from an I-495 overpass struck a car in Prince George's County ("Md. to inspect aging bridges," Feb. 13).

    • Rural counties need a transportation lockbox [Letter]
      Rural counties need a transportation lockbox [Letter]

      This fall, Maryland voters will have a constitutional amendment on the ballot of interest to all state residents, taxpayers and drivers: Question 1, which will create a "lockbox" for state transportation funds.

    • Gas tax is wasted
      Gas tax is wasted

      In your editorial, "Congress on the clock" (April 13), you talk about the federal Highway Trust Fund going bankrupt unless Congress acts to raise taxes. Motorists deserve better highways and bridge repair, but the truth is not all of the tax money motorists pay goes to build or repair roads or...

    • The transportation lockbox [Editorial]
      The transportation lockbox [Editorial]

      Our view: Vote 'yes' on Question 1 and lock down state transportation funding — but don't expect Annapolis to throw away the key

    • Put 'trust' back in Transportation Trust Fund [Letter]
      Put 'trust' back in Transportation Trust Fund [Letter]

      A proposed state constitutional amendment creating a firewall for the Transportation Trust Fund will be on the ballot this fall, and while the legislation is flawed, it deserves voter support. The legislation (Senate Bill 829 of 2013) received bipartisan support in both the House and Senate.