Tougher gun control laws won't result in fewer violent crimes

Is there no end of opportunities to challenge those who would restrict, curtail, register and eventually confiscate the guns of law-abiding citizens? ("In gun control, no easy fix for Baltimore's violence," Jan. 27.)

I would ask gun-control advocates whether they believe in and support the law. I'm certain the great majority of them would say yes. Then I would ask: Did you know that the so-called government gun buy-backs" are illegal — since they are illegal transmission of weapons, with one of the defendants being the government.

No background checks are conducted on the persons "transferring" possession of these firearms to the government; could there be felons among them? Isn't it required by the law that background checks be performed? Yet they are not.

There is much said about the "effectiveness" of the Brady Bill; it is extolled as a "success." Really? The anti-Second Amendment people say it has prevented thousands of felons from purchasing weapons. But how many of felons were actually prevented from purchasing a gun?

Finally, there is no such thing as "gun violence" — never was, never will be. Guns are machines, inanimate objects that are incapable of human emotion or thought. Violence is a "people thing," and the instrument may or may not be a gun. A more accurate term would be a "violent crime committed by a person using a gun."

Robert L. DiStefano

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • Hogan, guns and the attorneys general
      Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

      During the recent gubernatorial campaign, The Sun and several thoughtful citizens were perplexed about the discrepancy between the National Rifle Association's notorious A- rating for Larry Hogan and the candidate's repeated promise that he won't overturn Maryland's gun law if elected. In fact,...

    • Maryland's gun law is working
      Maryland's gun law is working

      The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

    Comments
    Loading