Law-abiding gun owners are not the problem

I would like to correct a few misconceptions in Ron Meservey's recent letter about gun control ("Hunters and target shooters don't need assault rifles," Dec. 31).

While the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., was the act of a disturbed individual, and I do not condone such behavior by anyone, the fact that politicians are once again crying for more gun laws is not the answer to this problem.

This country has more gun laws than it knows what to do with. What we need is not gun control but control of criminals and crime.

Why do we blame crimes such as this on inanimate objects? The blame should properly be put on the person. If people like the elementary school shooter were prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law rather than have their charges plea bargained down to result in less prison time, maybe we could get a handle on crime in this country.

Mr. Meservey misses the point when it comes to the Second Amendment and the Founding Fathers' intent in including it in the Bill of Rights. I take offense when people start telling me that some portion of the Constitution they don't feel comfortable with should be repealed.

The whole reason this amendment was included in the Constitution was to give citizens a way of holding an overreaching government to account. The Second Amendment cements all the other rights and privileges that we enjoy in this country.

A lot of good people have given their lives to protect and defend our Constitution. Let's not dishonor their memory by simply throwing away the parts we feel are no longer valid.

If people want to kill each other they will find a way to do so, if not with a gun, then by some other means. Do not penalize those of us who use our guns for legitimate and legal purposes. We are not the problem.

Tim Flaherty, Bel Air

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • Maryland's gun law is working
      Maryland's gun law is working

      The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

    • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
      Md. gun law is working [Letter]

      Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

    • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
      Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

      Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

    • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

      Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

    • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
      The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

      While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

    • Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]
      Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]

      U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake's decision upholding Maryland's assault weapons ban isn't a victory for anyone ("A victory for public safety," Aug. 14).

    Comments
    Loading