Don't weep for farms losing illegal immigrant labor

Your recent article, "Labor shortages plague farms," (July 7) states the plight of American farmers. What it does not address is that these farmers have become so accustomed to breaking the law to get cheap labor that they think they have a right to it. For decades they have been hiring illegal immigrants to get an unfair advantage over those who choose to abide by the law or have such small operations that they do not hire non-family members.

They complain that they can not find American workers to do these jobs although we have high unemployment. This stems from the fact they only want to pay illegal-immigrant-level wages and that those with access to our welfare programs find that easier than working low-wage hard farm jobs. If employers were forced to hire legal workers they would have to pay higher wages, and the cost of our food and other products would go up.

On the other hand we would no longer be providing benefits to illegal immigrants, the cost of our welfare programs would go down, and those Americans who took those jobs would enjoy a sense of self-worth. Hiring Americans would be a win-win-win situation.

Russ Swatek, Columbia

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Don't finance amnesty
    Don't finance amnesty

    Funding for the federal government under the current continuing resolution runs out on Tuesday, Dec. 11 at midnight, and the Republican majority in the House of Representatives seems poised to prevent another government shut down.

  • Immigration reform can wait
    Immigration reform can wait

    The Sun's recent editorial, "No lame duck president" (Nov. 16), made the editorial board look a little ridiculous.

  • Alexander Hamilton was undocumented
    Alexander Hamilton was undocumented

    If an orphaned 17-year-old born out of wedlock to a Scottish father and a French mother on the island of Nevis in the British West Indies arrived in New York City by ship today, would he be deported?

  • Immigration reform, yes, executive action, no
    Immigration reform, yes, executive action, no

    Is the looming battle over immigration really about Congress' power to legislate immigration policy or about the president's power to set policy by executive order? I think it's the latter. But what really is at stake is the ability of Congress to deal effectively with the millions of illegal...

  • Obama casts himself as a dictator with immigration action
    Obama casts himself as a dictator with immigration action

    On Thursday President Barack Obama granted amnesty to 5 million illegal aliens even though he declared it is not amnesty ("Obama makes his case for immigration action," Nov. 21). He has lost credibility with all the lies he has said in the past six years as president. What he did was...

  • Don't send $1B to Central America
    Don't send $1B to Central America

    The Obama administration has a plan to pour $1 billion of U.S. taxpayer money into Central America "to try to slow the flow of unaccompanied minors and other migrants without documentation" to the U.S. ("Democrats press Kerry on $1B Latin aid request," Feb. 25). Just wondering, wouldn't $1...

  • Let veterans patrol the border
    Let veterans patrol the border

    Recently I heard President Obama's wife, Michelle, express her concern about veterans ("Give a veteran a chance," Nov. 10).

  • What is immigration costing Md.?
    What is immigration costing Md.?

    I read with interest The Sun's article, "More school money sought" (Jan. 12). The article notes that the superintendent of Baltimore County Public Schools is requesting an 8.7 percent increase in the school budget. In part, the increase is needed due to "an influx of children in need" and "to...

Comments
Loading