City economic development projects don't produce living-wage jobs

I applaud The Sun for its recent editorial on income inequality ("Labor reawakens," April 27). The increasing income inequality in this country affects the ability of families to survive, much less thrive, on what they earn from minimum wage jobs.

The editorial highlighted a labor strike by Chicago low-wage workers and their "Fight for 15" rally. Yet the fact that Baltimore workers are organizing around "fair development" was mentioned in only one sentence. I wonder why The Sun did not find it important to cover the local "reawakening" here by reporting on the Fair Development Rally and March held April 20th.

A major focus of that event was the billions of dollars Baltimore residents have given in tax breaks to wealthy developers — without requiring that benefits be returned to the public in the form of living-wage jobs so that people in our city can pull themselves out of poverty.

The developers make big promises to the mayor, the Baltimore Development Corp., and the City Council, and elected officials allow them tax breaks based on their often inflated claims.

How has our city fared given this type of economic development? It is clear that if Baltimore is ever going to lift people out of poverty, we will have to do as the Chicago workers have done: Take matters into our own hands.

It is time for our city to find a new way of doing economic development.

Betty Robinson, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • How Republicans are ruining America
      How Republicans are ruining America

      On the national level, the cost of citizens not voting is quickly becoming apparent. Economically, the seeds of the next recession have been sown by the Republican weakening of financial controls so once again the greedy of Wall Street can gamble on dangerous financial derivatives with...

    • Regulate the banks
      Regulate the banks

      Dan Rodricks' recent column attributing amnesia to our Congress and president for dispensing with the requirement that big banks refrain from making risky investments with taxpayers' deposits was right on target ("For too many in Washington, a phantom recession," Dec. 21).

    • Do Democrats run the economy better than Republicans? Of course not
      Do Democrats run the economy better than Republicans? Of course not

      I read John Hanger's commentary "Democrats run the economy better" (Oct. 30) and it should have been titled "Democrats run the economy into the ground."

    • Dem's better for the economy? That's a laugh
      Dem's better for the economy? That's a laugh

      Thanks for running the John Hanger's recent commentary ("Democrats run the economy better," Oct. 30).

    • Democrats have run the economy (and everything else) into the ground
      Democrats have run the economy (and everything else) into the ground

      Was John Hanger's recent commentary supposed be run on April's Fools Day instead of Halloween ("Democrats run the economy better," Oct. 30). Surely his supposed reasoning on the subject of why Democrats run the economy better than Republicans was with tongue in cheek.

    • Obama has U.S. moving backward [Letter]
      Obama has U.S. moving backward [Letter]

      I read with disbelief a letter writer's premise that President Barack Obama has kept the country moving forward ("Obama has kept the country moving forward," Oct. 13). Apparently, she has not noted the international messes that we have created with fewer allies but many coddled enemies. We have...

    Comments
    Loading