City economic development projects don't produce living-wage jobs

I applaud The Sun for its recent editorial on income inequality ("Labor reawakens," April 27). The increasing income inequality in this country affects the ability of families to survive, much less thrive, on what they earn from minimum wage jobs.

The editorial highlighted a labor strike by Chicago low-wage workers and their "Fight for 15" rally. Yet the fact that Baltimore workers are organizing around "fair development" was mentioned in only one sentence. I wonder why The Sun did not find it important to cover the local "reawakening" here by reporting on the Fair Development Rally and March held April 20th.

A major focus of that event was the billions of dollars Baltimore residents have given in tax breaks to wealthy developers — without requiring that benefits be returned to the public in the form of living-wage jobs so that people in our city can pull themselves out of poverty.

The developers make big promises to the mayor, the Baltimore Development Corp., and the City Council, and elected officials allow them tax breaks based on their often inflated claims.

How has our city fared given this type of economic development? It is clear that if Baltimore is ever going to lift people out of poverty, we will have to do as the Chicago workers have done: Take matters into our own hands.

It is time for our city to find a new way of doing economic development.

Betty Robinson, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • Free community college is a bad idea
      Free community college is a bad idea

      Free community college is another poorly thought idea from President Barack Obama ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan. 21). Am I against opening up the opportunity for many who cannot afford college? Absolutely not, but here is my concern. We already require K-12 education...

    • It's not the size of the government that's the problem
      It's not the size of the government that's the problem

      Some believe the central political issue of our era is the size of the government. They're wrong. The central issue is whom the government is for.

    • If the economy isn't as rosy as it should be, blame the GOP [Letter]
      If the economy isn't as rosy as it should be, blame the GOP [Letter]

      Commentator Peter Morici's recent column on President Barack Obama's job numbers is a real flight of fancy ("The economy under Obama is not as rosy as numbers suggest," Oct. 7).

    • How Republicans are ruining America
      How Republicans are ruining America

      On the national level, the cost of citizens not voting is quickly becoming apparent. Economically, the seeds of the next recession have been sown by the Republican weakening of financial controls so once again the greedy of Wall Street can gamble on dangerous financial derivatives with...

    • Regulate the banks
      Regulate the banks

      Dan Rodricks' recent column attributing amnesia to our Congress and president for dispensing with the requirement that big banks refrain from making risky investments with taxpayers' deposits was right on target ("For too many in Washington, a phantom recession," Dec. 21).

    • Milking the rich is not a solution
      Milking the rich is not a solution

      I was saddened and disappointed to read The Sun's editorial regarding President Barack Obama's State of the Union address ("Mr. Obama's tax plan," Jan. 21).

    • Mr. Obama's tax plan
      Mr. Obama's tax plan

      It's a pretty safe bet that Congress is not going to react to President Barack Obama's State of the Union address by immediately turning around and agreeing to his priorities like free community college and mandatory sick leave. When was the last time any presidential initiative got that kind...

    • Obama's middle class 'help' is useless
      Obama's middle class 'help' is useless

      All we hear from President Barack Obama is that he is for the middle class. Well, I consider myself middle class. I am a retired homeowner, so let's see how this pans out for me.

    Comments
    Loading