City economic development projects don't produce living-wage jobs

I applaud The Sun for its recent editorial on income inequality ("Labor reawakens," April 27). The increasing income inequality in this country affects the ability of families to survive, much less thrive, on what they earn from minimum wage jobs.

The editorial highlighted a labor strike by Chicago low-wage workers and their "Fight for 15" rally. Yet the fact that Baltimore workers are organizing around "fair development" was mentioned in only one sentence. I wonder why The Sun did not find it important to cover the local "reawakening" here by reporting on the Fair Development Rally and March held April 20th.

A major focus of that event was the billions of dollars Baltimore residents have given in tax breaks to wealthy developers — without requiring that benefits be returned to the public in the form of living-wage jobs so that people in our city can pull themselves out of poverty.

The developers make big promises to the mayor, the Baltimore Development Corp., and the City Council, and elected officials allow them tax breaks based on their often inflated claims.

How has our city fared given this type of economic development? It is clear that if Baltimore is ever going to lift people out of poverty, we will have to do as the Chicago workers have done: Take matters into our own hands.

It is time for our city to find a new way of doing economic development.

Betty Robinson, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • Republicans have eviscerated the middle class, and Democrats have let them
      Republicans have eviscerated the middle class, and Democrats have let them

      Dan Rodricks' column "Let's help the poor, but not close to home" (Feb. 3) was right on target. Yes, and Ronald Regan started the great disintegration of student aid, social services, welfare benefits and federal support for public housing and urban renewal which has continued to this day.

    • Lift the cap on Social Security taxes
      Lift the cap on Social Security taxes

      Reviewing the 2016 federal spending graphs that accompanied John Fritze's excellent article, it is obvious, at least to me, that 50 percent of the spending could be offset with one minimal tax increase ("What's in it for Md.," Feb. 3). However, no politician would have the intestinal...

    • A constructive idea for infrastructure, taxes
      A constructive idea for infrastructure, taxes

      As much as the $4 trillion budget President Barack Obama sent to Congress Monday is a highly political document giving his allies things to rally around and his opponents proposals about which to grouse, the spending plan succeeds at putting two issues of irrefutable importance front and center...

    • Mr. Obama's 529 brouhaha
      Mr. Obama's 529 brouhaha

      Rarely does a president flip-flop on an initiative presented in the State of the Union address as quickly as Barack Obama did this week. He reversed himself on 529 college savings plans on Tuesday, which was just seven days after his speech to the nation. Such a political miscalculation is...

    • Free community college is a bad idea
      Free community college is a bad idea

      Free community college is another poorly thought idea from President Barack Obama ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan. 21). Am I against opening up the opportunity for many who cannot afford college? Absolutely not, but here is my concern. We already require K-12 education...

    • Obama's middle class 'help' is useless
      Obama's middle class 'help' is useless

      All we hear from President Barack Obama is that he is for the middle class. Well, I consider myself middle class. I am a retired homeowner, so let's see how this pans out for me.

    • Milking the rich is not a solution
      Milking the rich is not a solution

      I was saddened and disappointed to read The Sun's editorial regarding President Barack Obama's State of the Union address ("Mr. Obama's tax plan," Jan. 21).

    • Obama is a socialist, not a 'populist'
      Obama is a socialist, not a 'populist'

      President Barack Obama is a populist? How about cradle-to-grave socialist? There is no area of your life where government will not intrude, impose its will and dissipate any sense of individual responsibility you might have had left ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan....

    Comments
    Loading