Opinion
Grading City Hall: See our report card for L.A. City Council President Herb Wesson
Los Angeles Times

Iran is serious about nuclear talks; it's the U.S. that has stymied progress on the issue

The report onIran'srefusal to negotiate about its nuclear program is misleading ("Iran defiant in response to EU's boycott of its oil," Jan. 24). Iran's "unwillingness to negotiate" is belied by the fact that Iran negotiated with the U.S. long before the implementation of sanctions ostensibly designed to force it back to the bargaining table.

In the first and only American attempt to negotiate with Iran on this issue, the U.S. accepted an agreement between Iran and third-party countries that would have allowed Iran to transfer 1,200 kilograms of low- enriched uranium in exchange for fuel rods enriched to 20 percent for the production of medical isotopes. But the Obama administration walked away from this agreement when Iran wanted a guarantee that it would receive the fuel rods.

The U.S. is the party unwilling to negotiate in good faith without preconditions. Iran under the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty has a right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, and its willingness to concede that right in negotiations with the U.S. demonstrated a seriousness that the U.S. lacks.

John G. Bailey, Edgemere

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Iran deal threatens Israel

    Iran deal threatens Israel

    It is sad to see The Baltimore Sun's editorial board acknowledge its support for this awful deal with Iran ("A 'good enough' deal," July 27). War will not be the result if the deal is not signed, but at least the sanctions would still be in place. The only countries benefiting from this deal will...

  • Iran deal falls woefully short

    Iran deal falls woefully short

    "Good enough" is not an acceptable alternative when it comes to making a nuclear deal with Iran, a government that consistently urges for "death to America and Israel" ("A 'good enough' deal," July 27). There are far too many questions left in this deal for Congress to accept it at this point in...

  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Regarding Ray McGovern's commentary "Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?" (July 20), much as we'd like to believe this is a good deal for the U.S., the facts suggest otherwise.

  • Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    In 1938, the prime ministers of the United Kingdom and France signed a agreement called the Munich Pact with Adolph Hitler. This act effectively sealed the fate of portions of Czechoslovakia.

  • Don't trust Iran deal

    Don't trust Iran deal

    In response to KAL's cartoon of July 19 depicting Republican hawks not trusting a peace dove brought by President Barack Obama under the guise of the Iran Nuke Deal, I have a two word response: Neville Chamberlain.

Comments
Loading
70°