Iran nuclear threat is real and alarming

It is remarkable that Shibley Telhami can expound 10 points on the Iranian nuclear issue yet totally omit three of the most important aspects of this critical issue ("Iran, Israel, America: 10 points of interconnection," April 23).

First, Iran's leaders repeatedly call for the destruction of Israel and arm and fund Islamic extremists responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans soldiers.

Second, the Iranian regime believes that the arrival of the Shia messiah known as the "Mahdi" can be hastened by annihilating Israel, the "Little Satan," and the United States, the "Great Satan."

Third, Iran's long record of lies and duplicity concerning their nuclear program clearly evidences a strategic goal of using negotiations to stall for time to achieve the nuclear point of no return.

These three points are why so many people throughout the world disagree with Mr. Telhami's claim that a nuclear armed Iran is a "manageable" challenge and one that Israel "may be able to live with." It is also why the West should apply all of its energy and resources to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear capability, rather than pursue Mr. Telhami's naive dream of a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East which would only undermine Israel's security.

Jay Bernstein, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce
    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as...

  • Keep talking with Iran
    Keep talking with Iran

    The announcement today that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to extend talks over Tehran's disputed nuclear program is far short of what we might have hoped for. But the extension can't be counted as a failure either. If the goal is to keep up the pressure on Iran's leaders to reach a deal,...

  • Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]
    Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]

    Thank you for your support for continuing negotiations in your July 17th "Keep talking with Iran" editorial. U.S. and Iranian negotiators agreed to continue the talks through late November due to the progress they have made already toward peacefully resolving the standoff over Iran's nuclear...

  • Obama foolish to write Khamenei
    Obama foolish to write Khamenei

    To make matters regarding the negotiations with Iran over its nuclear and missile program even worse than what was described by Cal Thomas ("U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce," Nov. 8), it is now known that President Barack Obama chose to contact Ayatollah Khamenei during that...

  • Iran talks peace while it builds its bomb
    Iran talks peace while it builds its bomb

    Unfortunately, the U.S. and Iran's decision to extend their nuclear talks with a new deadline of June, 2015, will only give Iran the opportunity to further its nuclear and ballistic missile programs unhindered ("Keep talking with Iran," Nov. 24).

  • Keep talking with Iran [Editorial]

    Our view: With nuclear talks likely to be extended, it's crucial that Congress continue to give the administration room to negotiate

  • U.S. should end Iran sanctions [Letter]
    U.S. should end Iran sanctions [Letter]

    The recent commentary, "An enemy revisited" (July 13), correctly states that in witnessing the harsh realities "the United States would do well to reassess its view on Iran." In fact, we should have a dialogue and trade with Iran, a country that does not threaten U.S. national interests. The...

  • Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]
    Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]

    While reading the summary of key 2013 events, when I got to the description that "Syria blinked," I had to blink myself. I assume the writer meant "Syria winked." At least that's about as much attention as Bashar al-Assad paid to President Barack Obama's red lines — or maybe they were...