Stop the latest backdoor stimulus

In 2009, President Barack Obama lifted the $400 billion cap off the bailout money that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae could pass on to the taxpayers. Apparently, $400 billion wasn't enough. Fannie and Freddie are publicly owned. You and I own them and all the debt they are accumulating and passing on. At times, the administration has allowed companies like Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway to "buy their losses," a process by which a company gets to reduce their tax burden by giving cash in exchange for the bad debt. Ultimately, that company makes a bigger profit, and the taxpayers lose out on taxes they could have collected. There's no telling how much debt has been passed on to the taxpayers through Fannie and Freddie to date, and it's about to get worse.

Now, I understand Mr. Obama intends to bypass Congress and have the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates Fannie and Freddie, loosen the terms (another way of saying "deregulate") of the President's Home Affordable Refinance Program. That's a program in which the government (that would be the taxpayers in this case) backs loans of up to 125 percent of a home's value. The president wants Fannie and Freddie to reduce loan fees and to waive fees on borrowers that refinance into loans with shorter terms.

If Fannie and Freddie were privately-owned companies, they'd never take these kinds of risks and they'd never survive with these kinds of losses. They've become a magic well that the president can draw money from whenever he chooses, and we are stuck paying his bills. While the Democrats may cheer the president's attempt to "stimulate" the housing market at the taxpayers' expense, once again, the taxpayers are helpless. We have no choice but to absorb the debt that will be passed on. There's no guarantee that housing values will increase in the near future or even in our lifetimes. If they don't, then those loans for 125 percent of a house's value are throwing our good money after bad. Those fees that Fannie and Freddie should have charged will be added to our debts.

This is just another artificial stimulus at our expense. If the president had allowed the housing market to bottom out naturally, it would have already happened a long time ago, and we'd be rebounding. As it stands, we're still walking the housing market down, cushioning its fall with our tax dollars.

This is a backdoor stimulus. It's not helping the inner cities. It's not helping the crowds that are occupying Wall Street. It's helping people who are already making their payments. It's helping people who don't need help.

Fred Pasek, Frederick

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Unemployment is worse than Obama administration claims

    The Obama administration and the liberal news media continues to keeps up their line that the unemployment rate is between 8 percent 9 percent. Don't believe it, as nothing could be further from the truth. The real unemployment rate ranges close to 15 percent or 16 percent because of the Obama's...

  • Help for the unemployed?

    Help for the unemployed?

    Our view: Renewal of unemployment benefits, largely overlooked in Congress' debate over extending the payroll tax cut, comes with a hefty price

  • Timid Democrats and radical Republicans: A dangerous combination

    Your article, "New budget to renew battles" (Feb. 12) points out the stark and perhaps unprecedented separation between our two major political parties. Democrats continue to display timidity and confusion and are often too ready to compromise, but they have generally proposed balanced approaches...

  • Taxing stock gains would hit middle class, too

    Not just the 1 percent invest in stocks. The Democrats would have you believe that the middle class don't get any income from the stocks, so we should double the tax rate on income derived from the stock market. Where exactly do they expect the "middle class" to put their money? Saving to put kids...

  • Obama's plan to raise capital gains taxes will drive investment offshore

    In his State of the Union Address, President Obama barely touched on the country's soon-to-be $16 trillion national debt, massive joblessness, entitlement insolvency, economy-crippling government regulations and the other compelling issues ("Obama targets economy, taxes in address," Jan. 25).

  • What has 30 years of Reaganomics brought us?

    Thank you Dan Rodricks for your insightful commentary ("A man out of tune with the times," Jan. 23). It was a perfect review of Reaganomics 30 years later. A world of huge disparity, where those who became rich by living in this great country don't want to pay their fair share. Shame on them.

  • Creating an economy 'built to last'

    Creating an economy 'built to last'

    President calls for tax changes to bring jobs home, all-of-the-above energy strategy and a 'reemployment' system

  • A level playing field for jobs

    A level playing field for jobs

    Peter Morici says U.S. priorities for boosting employment should be fair trade policies, aggressive energy development