Occupy Baltimore — for what?

The Occupy Baltimore protest today at the Inner Harbor, and the protests on Wall Street that inspired it and similar demonstrations around the country, are a welcome sign that outrage at the nation's political and economic system isn't confined to the political right. It isn't just conservatives who are mad about what's going on in this country, and the spreading protest movement among a markedly diverse coalition of people, fostered by a heavy reliance on social media, has the potential to add a left-leaning strain of populism that has been missing from the conversation.

The movement is a leaderless one and lacks specific goals or agendas, but the main thrust of the protesters' ire is that corporate greed and a political system beholden to moneyed special interests have created a system that provides immense benefit to a small group of people at the expense of everyone else. The rallying cry is, "We are the 99 percent" — as opposed to the 1 percent who control an increasing and wildly disproportionate share of the nation's wealth. Protesters make comparisons between their movement and those of the Arab Spring that resulted in the overthrow of governments that had seemed impervious to the popular will.

But the Occupy Together protests (an umbrella term for the national movement) have much more in common with the tea party than members of either group would likely want to admit. The tea party started with a CNBC rant about the prospect of bailouts for people who took on foolish mortgages, and the Occupy protests started on Wall Street because of anger about government bailouts of a finance industry that took foolish risks. The two groups come to different and to some degree opposing conclusions about the cause of the nation's problems; the tea party blames an overreaching federal government, and the Occupy Together protesters generally blame corporate greed and its enablers in Washington. But they are responding to the same anxiety — a sense that the deck is stacked against ordinary people and that the American dream of getting ahead in life is slipping away.

The encampment near Wall Street has lasted longer and has had much wider influence than most people might have guessed when it started last month. But if the protesters aspire for it to have real impact on the direction of national policy, they could learn a few lessons from tea party.

That movement has certainly benefited from friendly coverage on Fox News and the financial backing of the billionaire Koch brothers, among others, avenues that are not likely open to the Occupy Together crowd. But what has helped make the tea party a mass movement that is now, to a large extent, calling the shots in the House of Representatives and in the Republican presidential nominating contest is its sharp focus and its willingness to engage directly in the political process. The tea party movement deliberately eschews talk of social issues like abortion or gay rights, and it deals little with foreign policy. That allows people who may disagree about many issues to coalesce around the one thing they do agree on, which is that the federal government is too big and needs to be reined in.

The General Assembly of the Occupy Wall Street protest (an all-comers group operating by consensus gauged through a set of hand signals) issued a manifesto on Sept. 29 listing a set of grievances that includes: large executive bonuses at banks that got government bailouts; the ills of industrial agriculture; the death penalty; pharmaceutical firms' efforts to block the sale of generic medications; corporate campaign spending; outsourcing; racial and sex discrimination; and the manufacture of weapons of mass destruction. It ends with an asterisk ("These grievances are not all-inclusive") and a call for the people of the world to "assert your power" and "make your voices heard." To what end, it doesn't say.

The Occupy Together movement is still in its infancy, and it has plenty of time to sharpen is message and to advocate for specific goals. We hope that it does. The tea party movement has given voice to millions, but it doesn't speak for everyone who feels left out and wants to change the direction of the country. Events like today's protest at the Inner Harbor, or those in New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Chicago and elsewhere, help send that message. But turning that into results is going to take more than few hundred or thousand protesters in the public square. The forces the protesters are fighting are focused and disciplined; they need to be too.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Occupy detractors must feel threatened

    Columnist Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. has certainly written quite a flamboyant article regarding the Occupy movement ("Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23). In it, he states a disconnect between them and the so-called "middle class," a catch-all term he uses to project his own identity. Most...

  • The importance of Occupy

    The Occupy Wall Street movement was created to make people aware of issues that aren't usually discussed in the mainstream corporate media: the greed of the powerful, the destruction of the environment, violence against women and gays and the perpetual war waged for oil and other resources,...

  • Ehrlich carries 1 percent's water

    In his recent column ("'Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23), Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. illustrates the denial of economic reality in America that is continually propagated by the 1 percent. At the heart of his argument is the idea that the American Dream is alive and well, the happy...

  • 'Occupy' is gone? We'll see in November

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column about the first anniversary of the Occupy movement betrays a hubris, a willful stupidity, and the usual threadbare deceptions ("Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23). Such are the building blocks of the corrupt edifice that Occupy seeks to dismantle.

  • Occupy movement got it right

    Former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column on the Occupy movement summed up the us vs. them Republican party platform (Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23).

  • Conservatives see media bias no matter the facts

    The usual whining from the extreme right about media bias is evident in a recent letter from Stephen Sewell ("Sun lavishes attention on 'Occupy,' ignores tea party," Sept. 24). The writer is long on allegations and short on facts.

  • Sun lavishes attention on bumbling 'Occupy,' ignores effective tea party

    Let me get this straight: a spontaneous movement arises and takes up the name "Tea Party" based on historical actions and the acronym "taxed enough already," amasses a very large number of either followers or sympathizers, and literally reverses the party breakdown in the U.S. House of...

  • Occupy Baltimore: a historical footnote

    It's sad to see a good idea fizzle, and that's what's happened to Occupy Baltimore ("The 1 percent are winning," Sept. 18). But, the movement didn't just "fizzle," it committed suicide.

Comments
Loading