Government should get out of the flood-insurance business


A recent headline stated that "Congress approves more aid for Sandy's victims" (Jan 5). Really?

My take is that what Congress did was require our children to borrow another $10 billion to pay contractual obligations of government insurance claims. Insurance premiums are only covering about 1 percent of previous claims, and our children will pay the other 99 percent.

Soon another $50 billion will be added to the tab, and Sandy will not be the last disaster.

The government needs to either get out of the flood-insurance business or make premiums cover outlays. Sandy's victims must be helped, but we cannot continue to subsidize high-risk communities at this level in the future.

Food, water, emergency care and temporary shelter should always be provided, but not cash. Some flood-prone areas are looking forward to rebuilding bigger and better every couple of years — all on our dime.

Dan Griffin, Perry Hall

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
    Related Content
    • What was Harris thinking in opposing Sandy aid?

      I must admit that when I heard that Rep. Andy Harris voted against the bill that would give sufficient money to the federal flood insurance program to allow it to disperse funds to those afflicted by Hurricane Sandy, I was a bit surprised ("Congress approves more aid for Sandy's...