Hundreds of Baltimore-area families have volunteered for a government study to spray their suburban yards with pesticide, which researchers hope can protect them from
but that environmentalists warn is unsafe.
The goal, federal and state health officials say, is to find a new way to prevent the widespread illness, which is spread by tick bites and can cause fever,
and fatigue — and, if untreated, may even affect
, nerves and the heart.
Half of the 185 families who've signed up this year in Baltimore, Carroll, Harford and Howard counties are having the edges of their yards sprayed with bifenthrin, a chemical pesticide commonly applied around homes to fight ticks, fleas and mosquitoes. The others, without knowing it, are getting their property sprayed with water so officials can judge the effectiveness of the treatment.
"The question is, does it actually prevent a common, sometimes severe disease — and second, what's the lowest dose you can do?" said Dr. Clifford S. Mitchell, assistant director for environmental health and food protection in the state Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Environmental activists, though, contend that the study itself is putting the families at risk. Adults and children alike are being exposed to a pesticide that is classified by the
as a possible carcinogen, critics say, and that is being studied by the EPA for possible harm to reproductive and immune systems, among other things.
"It's improper to be conducting a human experiment like this," said Jay Feldman, executive director of Beyond Pesticides, a national group based in Washington. He and other activists contend federal and state health officials have not adequately informed volunteers about all the potential health risks.
The study, now in its second year, was underwritten by the
. The pesticide also is being tested on yards in Connecticut and New York. Last year, 440 other Maryland families participated.
Lyme disease, so named because it was first reported in
, Conn., is a bacterial illness transmitted when people are bitten by blacklegged ticks, more commonly known as deer ticks. It has become a major health concern in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, where a burgeoning population of deer have helped spread the disease beyond forests into suburbia.
There were 30,000 cases reported in 2010, according to the CDC, with the vast majority in those two regions. Maryland had 1,600 cases that year, well below the peak of more than 2,500 cases reported in 2007. But health officials believe that doctors often miss or don't report cases, and the actual number could be 10 times higher.
Many people living in the most affected states already have resorted to spraying their yards with pesticides to get rid of ticks, said Katherine Feldman, the state public health veterinarian. A survey in Connecticut found that 29 percent of homeowners contacted already pay a pest-control company to treat their properties, she said.
Health officials said it appears that a significant number of people do get bitten by infected ticks around their homes, not just when they go hiking through tall grass or a forest.
There's also evidence, they say, that the number of ticks in a yard can be reduced significantly by applying bifenthrin, a synthetic chemical similar to the natural insecticides produced by flowers like chrysanthemums.
"We know that pesticides are extraordinarily effective against ticks," Mitchell said. "We don't know if they result in a decrease in human disease."
Feldman, the state health veterinarian, said volunteers were recruited for the study by mailing fliers to residents in ZIP codes that have had a high incidence of Lyme disease.
The fliers sought single-family households with at least two people who were willing to have a "single, no-cost, commonly used pesticide application" to their yard and answer "short surveys" about ticks and their yards. For their trouble last year, they were offered $40 gift cards to a local grocery store, paid for by the CDC, according to the state veterinarian. The reward for this year's recruits has been scaled back to $25 gift cards.
Veronika Carella, who lives in western
, was among those invited to participate last year. She said she was appalled because her two children, now in college, have been registered for years on the state's list of chemically sensitive people. Though their 3.5-acre yard has woods and five resident deer — and her elderly mother contracted Lyme disease, most likely elsewhere — Carella said she believes the disease can be prevented without resorting to pesticide use.
Carella and others contend that prospective volunteers weren't informed clearly enough about the potential long-term health risks from being exposed to the pesticide.
"When you get a prescription, you're told all the things that can happen to you, including perhaps dying," said Ruth Berlin, executive director of the Maryland Pesticide Network, a coalition that seeks to limit pesticide use. She said the basic message given to prospective volunteers was that the pesticide is safe, which she disputes.
An EPA analysis of bifenthrin notes that there were nearly 1,300 incidents involving the pesticide from 2002 to 2009, and that while most were of "low severity," it appeared that even low amounts of the chemical can cause skin and respiratory irritation and dizziness.
The agency classifies it as a possible carcinogen based on rat exposure studies. It also has listed bifenthrin among a group of pesticides to be tested for their potential to act as "endocrine disruptors," which may affect humans or wildlife, even at low doses.
Health officials point out that the pesticide is currently registered by the EPA for use in controlling ticks. Participants are advised not to walk in the sprayed area for 24 hours and to keep pets away. Since the chemical is highly toxic to aquatic life, they've ruled out testing it on any yard that's within 100 feet of water.
And they say the study, as well as the information given to volunteers, was approved by both state and federal agency institutional review boards, which are set up to safeguard people participating in research.
"I won't say they're not putting themselves at any risk, because I never say that about anything," Mitchell said. But he added, "I believe the risks have been adequately conveyed."
Dr. Robert S. Lawrence, director of the
's Center for a Livable Future, disagreed after reviewing the packet of information supplied to prospective volunteers. Lawrence said the fact-sheet should have spelled out more clearly that, while nothing's been proven, questions have been raised about the long-term safety and potential impact on humans of bifenthrin.
Preliminary results for all three states from the first year of the study indicate that the yards treated with pesticide had 62 percent fewer ticks overall than the "control" yards sprayed with water, according to officials.
But the people in the treated households reported finding just as many ticks on their bodies as the residents of untreated properties, and there were basically the same number of Lyme disease cases reported in both groups.
Federal and state health officials say that if after a second year and more analysis there's no difference in tick bites or infection among the two groups, then they'll advise the public that spraying yards with pesticide really doesn't help prevent Lyme disease. Mitchell said he, for one, sees a certain irony in that, given the criticism the study has received from pesticide opponents.
But critics say such an outcome — discouraging more pesticide use — would not justify the risks to which they believe the study has exposed human subjects.
"We have no idea if we've caused more harm than good," Carella said.
An earlier version misstated the goals of the Maryland Pesticide Network. The Sun regrets the error.
Preventing Lyme disease:
•Apply tick repellants to skin or clothing
•After being outdoors, check your body for ticks
•Take a shower promptly to wash off any insects that haven't yet attached themselves