The changes go into effect in mid-January, the most contentious point being Instagram's ability to sell users' photos without informing or paying them. But local freelance photographer J.M. Giordano wasn't taking any chances. He canceled his account and moved over to a rival service, Flickr, Tuesday.
Photographer Ryan Stevenson -- who goes by RaRa professionally -- was still on an assignment when he heard about the changes, but he was planning on giving Instagram the heave-ho when he gothome, calling the move "just evil."
"I don't like the idea that my hard work can basically be stolen," says Stevenson who teaches photography for the Creative Alliance and regularly shoots for the Baltimore City Paper. "There is not a single photographer in the world that would accept those terms. Even if they changed it back, it's too little, too late."
Stevenson and Giordano were hardly alone as celebrities like actress Mia Farrow and
Giordano started using Instagram a few years ago and has taken more than 1,000 images with the
"I understand they have to make money," Giordano says of Instagram. "But as a professional photographer, I believe the person shooting should always get credit."
Stevenson said he just recently started using Instagram, used has the app as a "photographer's notebook," getting behind-the-scenes photos from shoots. But the humble photos can prove popular. He said recently sold about $400 worth of prints of Instagram photos.
Not everyone was ready to kill their Instagram account. Some voices on social media were calling the response over blown.
On New York Magazine's Daily Intelligencer blog, Kevin Roose wrote: "Your photos are not that interesting...Given the choice between buying a photo of