TOP 100 COMPANIES
Global leaders rack up growth
Boeing ranks among top performers; ADM, Merc advance on chart
Just when things were going along swimmingly for the stock market, investors were hit by the inflation shudders.
Fears that sky-high prices for oil, copper, gold and other commodities would spread to the rest of the economy derailed a bull market that is well into its fourth year.
Even while the current upward trend is seen as growing a bit long in the tooth, it remains the third-longest in market history, going back to 1926. And profits continue to grow at double-digit rates.
Before getting the shakes, Wall Street pushed the Dow Jones industrial average within 75 points of its all-time high. It finally dawned on investors, however, that the Federal Reserve's regimen of shock therapy for the economy won't be achieved without some pain.
Perhaps foreshadowing the recent uncertainty in the markets, several of the standby stocks in Illinois and northwest Indiana, as represented by the Tribune's annual Top 100 chart, were pulled down in a strong undertow over the past year. Companies that operate on a global stage elbowed their way into top positions.
A clear majority of the 100 companies in the chart displayed profit growth in their most recent fiscal years. In fact, about a quarter of the group saw profits shrink on a per-share basis. Remarkably, only seven saw a negative return on common equity.
Chicago economist Diane Swonk says huge manufacturers are benefiting from a boom in demand on other continents.
"Exports are picking up on the heels of a weaker dollar and improvements in the Japanese and European economies," said Swonk, of Mesirow Financial. "Europe, on the other hand, is struggling to circumvent labor problems by substituting capital for labor."
Over the next two years, Swonk is looking for capital investment by businesses to expand at the fastest rate since 1997. High energy prices are encouraging businesses to become more efficient, she added.
Moving higher in recent weeks has been Boeing Co., the Chicago-based aerospace giant, which displaced Abbott Laboratories as the area's No. 1 company in market capitalization early last month. (North Chicago-based Abbott still held the top spot on March 31, the date on which the chart's rankings are based.)
Boeing has seen investors' focus shift from a fruitless and costly argument over making military tanker planes to the company's global battle for dominance in commercial jetliners.
Thanks to its wildly successful, fuel-sipping 787 Dreamliner, which is expected to enter service in 2008, Boeing has placed European archrival Airbus SAS on the defensive. Earlier this month, Airbus denied reports it is going back to the drawing board for its touted A350 jet, which critics said is in dire need of a redesign. But sources said it is certain that Airbus will need at least a costly overhaul of the plane's basic plan.
As Boeing's fortunes have soared, so has its stock, finishing last week at $84.61, up 63 percent since the beginning of 2005. Its total return for 2005 was nearly 38 percent.
Abbott, a major global competitor in health care, seemed to reap only modest gains for the latest year, and its per-share profits grew less than 5 percent. It showed a negative total return.
Leapfrogging five other companies in the chart was Archer Daniels Midland Corp., long considered a staid, unimpressive processor of soybeans.
These days, the Decatur-based food manufacturing behemoth is sharing in the world's thirst for energy, as the global leader in making ethanol for fuel.
The fiefdom of scion Duane Andreas and members of his family for decades, Archer Daniels has anointed an outsider as chief executive for the first time--and a woman at that. Patricia Woertz, 53, a former executive of Chevron Corp., took over late last month.
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
Los Angeles Times welcomes civil dialogue about our stories; you must register with the site to participate. We filter comments for language and adherence to our Terms of Service, but not for factual accuracy. By commenting, you agree to these legal terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.
Having technical problems? Check here for guidance.