Like many technological advances, email has many fathers and mothers. But one claimant to the mantle of email's "inventor" has spent years trying to shoulder everyone else out of the way. And now he's filed a libel suit that could destroy one news website that has covered his campaign assiduously, and critically.
The aggrieved “inventor” is V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai, an India-born American entrepreneur. As a 14-year-old student in New Jersey in 1978, Ayyadurai devised an electronic messaging system for the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (now
But does that make him the "inventor of email," as he claims in his lawsuit? Versions of electronic messaging had been used as early as 1965 at MIT, came into their own in connection with the development of the government's ARPANET (which evolved into the Internet) by 1972 and were being worked on in labs such as Xerox PARC through that decade.
Ayyadurai has pursued his claim to be "the man who invented email" energetically in the news media. Lately he's taken a new tack: filing lawsuits against news organizations that challenge his claim. His most recent target is a small technology news site called Techdirt and its parent company, the Redwood City research firm Floor64.
Last month, Ayyadurai filed a $15-million libel suit against Techdirt in Boston federal court, asserting that he had been defamed by its critical reporting challenging his claim. The lawsuit says, "Dr. Ayyadurai named his computer program 'email.' He was the first person to create this term, because he was inventing the 'electronic' (or 'e') version of the interoffice paper-based 'mail' system."
Techdirt says that because of its legal costs, the lawsuit has put it in a 1st Amendment "fight for its life." In a Jan. 11 blog post aimed at drumming up public and financial support, Masnick wrote, "This fight could very well be the end of Techdirt, even if we are completely on the right side of the law."
Ayyadurai has a high-profile attorney working on his behalf: Charles Harder, who pursued Gawker media into bankruptcy on behalf of Hulk Hogan. That lawsuit was bankrolled by Silicon Valley billionaire
We reported on Ayyadurai in 2014 after the Huffington Post ran a five-part series broadcasting his claim. It was a heartwarming tale with an irresistible hook that began, "In 1978, a 14-year-old boy invented email." The first article continued, "Email wasn't created, with a massive research budget, in big institutions like the ARPANET, MIT or the military. … Email was created in the heart of inner city Newark, NJ, at a relatively small institution, with little to no funding."
As we pointed out, however, email indeed had been created at "big institutions like the ARPANET, MIT or the military." To the extent that any individual was given credit in the tech community as its single "inventor," that was Ray Tomlinson of Bolt Beranek and Newman, a major contractor on the ARPANET. In 1971 or 1972, Tomlinson made refinements to existing message protocols and incorporated the use of the "@" sign as a component of message addresses. But electronic messaging systems were in vigorous development through the decade, with new features emerging such as subject lines and "cc" fields that remain familiar parts of the systems we use all day every day.
The Huffington Post eventually took down the series, some parts of which were written by people associated with the New Jersey medical university and therefore had an interest in claiming parentage for the institution. But versions of the articles live on at this website.
HuffPo wasn't the first publisher to buy into Ayyadurai's story. The Washington Post accepted it more or less at face value in 2012, after the Smithsonian Institution acquired some of Ayyadurai's papers for its technology collection. The Post reported that this was tantamount to Ayyadurai's having been "honored by [the] Smithsonian" as the "inventor of e-mail," but that wasn't true, and the newspaper eventually retracted the assertion. The Post's then-ombudsman, Patrick Pexton, snarkily defended the original article without doing his homework, and then had to run his own retraction. The Post was followed down this rabbit hole by then-New York Times tech columnist David Pogue, who accepted Ayyadurai's version of history for a tweet a few months later. Then he ran a retraction, stating that he had been "snookered."
As technologists and Web historians have written, the true history of email is one of repeated, organic iterations of fundamental systems, much of which took place years before Ayyadurai’s work. A paper by historian Thomas Haigh of the
Haigh writes that
The history of email is capacious enough to accommodate hundreds of inspired engineers and scientists. Ayyadurai merits acknowledgment as a contributor to this rich pageant, especially given the talent he showed at 14. But no one should claim to be the inventor of such a multifaceted, evolutionary system, and Ayyadurai should stop trying.