Why does Netflix deny it's buying preferential treatment?

It's only fair that bandwidth-hogging Netflix and presumably its subscribers pay Comcast more for broadband access than those who don't use the service.

Netflix is paying cable giant Comcast a pile of cash for what the companies say will be "no preferential network treatment."

Sure, because corporations routinely give money to one another just for the fun of it.

The reality is that Netflix is handing Comcast an unspecified chunk of change, likely millions of dollars, for what they say is a "more direct connection" to the cable company's broadband network.

That's preferential treatment. And that's not necessarily a bad thing.

The deal, announced over the weekend, has broad ramifications for consumers. First, it could place the cost of Netflix's bandwidth-hogging service on the shoulders of Netflix subscribers, who will presumably see their rates rise to accommodate the payoff to Comcast.

Secondly, it demonstrates the growing muscle of network owners such as Comcast, Time Warner Cable, AT&T and Verizon — companies that are the gatekeepers of broadband Internet access.

These telecom behemoths are beginning to use their market power to extract hefty sums from content providers desiring extra-zippy access to their networks.

And never mind that this is completely contrary to how federal regulators say things are supposed to work.

"This agreement is in no sense the outcome of a free market," said Craig Aaron, president of the digital rights group Free Press. "This isn't voluntary. This is Comcast having Netflix over a barrel."

Lowell McAdam, chief executive of Verizon Communications, wasted no time in announcing Monday that he too wants a taste of this action. "I think there's a good opportunity here," he said on CNBC-TV.

This would be the same Verizon that, according to Netflix, experienced a 14% drop in video-streaming speed for Netflix customers from December to January, even though speeds on most other Internet service providers held steady.

Neither Verizon nor Netflix said the slowdown was deliberate. But it's not hard to imagine someone in Verizon's control room turning down the dial on the Netflix feed to get a point across to the streaming service.

Netflix accounts for about a third of prime-time Internet traffic in North America, according to broadband research company Sandvine. Stir YouTube into the mix, and that's half of all online traffic between 6 and 10 p.m.

So if you're paying a monthly fee for a broadband Internet connection but you're not availing yourself of these services nightly, you're helping pay for other people's data-fat digital diets.

Kind of like the way pay-TV packages are stuffed full of channels that most people never watch. Pay-TV companies say this boosts diversity by having popular channels subsidize less-popular programming.

The truth is that it forces people to pay for products they don't want. That's unfair, just as it's unfair for light Internet users to have to pay for other people's heavier network demands.

This is where net neutrality enthusiasts will jump up and say, "Hey! All online content should be treated the same!"

And I agree with that in principle. But from a consumer perspective, all online content isn't the same, and it isn't accessed in equal measure by all Internet users.

If you use the Net to send email and read headlines, you're using significantly less bandwidth than someone binge-watching the Netflix series "House of Cards." Pricing for Internet access should reflect that difference.

This is why I favor some sort of mechanism that places a heavier financial burden on the Net's heaviest users — and Netflix's deal with Comcast appears to be a step in that direction.

Connect
Advertisement

VIDEO

ASK LAZ