Broadcasters are hoping that the daughter of a Supreme Court justice can help them convince the high court that Aereo -- the start-up service that streams local TV signals via the Internet -- is illegal and needs to be shutdown.
In their 65-page briefing filed Monday to the Supreme Court, broadcasters -- including
In an April 2013 article for the Media Institute that was cited twice, Ginsburg called a ruling in support of Aereo by the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, a "decision so inconsistent with statutory text and policy as to inspire surmise that the ruling was an April Fool's prank."
The briefing also cites another Media Institute piece by Ginsburg about international copyright law and Aereo. Ginsburg said she writes a bimonthly column for the Media Institute's intellectual property issues Web page but otherwise has no ties to the organization. She said she believed that contributors receive an honorarium of $1,000 for six columns per year.
The broadcasters are hoping to convince the Supreme Court that Aereo -- which charges consumers $8 to $12 a month for its service that includes a cloud-based digital video recorder -- violates copyright law. In their Monday filing, broadcasters argued that Aereo is a business "model premised on massive and unauthorized commercial exploitation of copyrighted works, where the prices of competitors are undercut because they are licensed and pay fees."
Broadcasters, who are not compensated by Aereo, added that the service undercuts laws on the book allowing broadcasters to charge pay-TV distributors to carry their signals.
Aereo has countered that consumers "have a fundamental right to watch over-the-air broadcast television via an antenna and to record copies for their personal use."
Attorneys for the plaintiffs declined to comment on the use of Ginsburg's article in the filing.
Follow Joe Flint on Twitter: @JBFlint.