latimes.com/features/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-dedicated-ereaders-irrelevant-say-many-publishing-executives-20130117,0,7649221.story
By Carolyn Kellogg
10:06 AM PST, January 17, 2013
| Advertisement |
|
|
Is your Kindle e-reader "irrelevant"? Yes, says a significant share of publishing executives.
That's one of the most interesting pieces of news to come out of Digital Book World, publishing's annual e-reading conference, which got underway Wednesday in New York.
Publishers Weekly reports on the opening day of the conference, where media analyst James McQuivey presented the results of a Forrester Research study that surveyed 53 publishing executives in an effort to discover their companies' "digital readiness."
Forty-five percent of those surveyed said standalone e-readers are "irrelevant." But they're not down on digital: 60% cited tablets -- such as the iPad or Kindle Fire -- as the ideal e-reading device.
This year, 85% of those surveyed are optimistic about the role of e-books. But when it comes to specifics, there seems to be some anxiety. Just "64% believe that publishers are 'capable of competing' in the new digital marketplace," Publishers Weekly reports, and "55% are confident that their own companies can compete." McQuivey noted that both those figures are down about 10% from last year.
Maybe the worries come from a tension between moving forward and figuring out how to make moving forward profitable. Most of the executives -- 85% -- produce apps, but almost half of those, 45%, say they're too expensive too produce. Only a minority -- 21% -- see apps presenting a revenue potential.
Digital Book World continues through Thursday.
ALSO:
Congrats to the Story Prize finalists
Is it time for the National Book Awards to change? Yes.
Video Interview: Will Self on his challenging new novel 'Umbrella'
Copyright © 2013, Los Angeles Times