A prayer paradox at the Supreme Court

Religious ConflictsProtestantismReligion and BeliefAntonin Scalia

Constitutional issues involving the separation of church and state are full of paradoxes, and Wednesday’s argument in the Supreme Court over prayers at town meetings illuminated one of them.

The justices were reviewing a federal appeals court’s ruling that the town of Greece, N.Y., violated the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment by beginning most of its monthly meetings with explicitly Christian prayers, some of them very detailed theologically.

A lawyer for two citizens who opposed the prayer — one a Jew, one an atheist — asked the court to rule that prayers at government meetings must be nonsectarian. That is more than the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals had required; it said that an occasional sectarian prayer would be permissible but that Greece had so stacked the deck in favor of explicitly Christian prayers that “an objective, reasonable person” would believe that the town endorsed Christianity.

Douglas Laycock, the lawyer for the plaintiffs in Greece, told the court: “We can treat the great majority of the people equally with the tradition of prayer to the Almighty, the governor of the universe, the creator of the world.” But Laycock acknowledged that the test he was proposing would leave some people out, atheists obviously as well as “true polytheists who don't understand their gods as manifestations of the one god.”

(Justice Antonin Scalia, who recently startled an interviewer by saying he believed in the devil, asked Laycock if his test would also exclude Satan-worshipers. Laycock said they were “probably out” but might be covered because they believe “the devil is the Almighty.”)

The paradox here is that the more encompassing a prayer is in terms of the number of faiths that can give assent to it, the more the citizen who can’t say the prayer in good conscience feels like an outsider.

If a town meeting begins with a hyper-sectarian prayer (say a Catholic prayer to the Virgin Mary), a Protestant who objects will at least know that lots of others in the room (Protestants, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims) feel the same. But a prayer to “the Almighty” or “Heavenly Father,” precisely because it’s acceptable to Protestants, Catholics, Jews and perhaps Muslims, makes the marginalization of the lonely atheist or Hindu even worse. The more people who qualify as “us,” the worse it is for “them.”

The only way to remedy that marginalization is to do away with prayers at government meetings altogether, a solution the court is unlikely to insist on. But town fathers (and mothers) can decide on their own to begin their proceedings not with a prayer but with a moment of silence, during which those in attendance can pray to any god or none. That, by the way, is what Greece did before 1999. It shouldn’t have messed with success.

ALSO:

Bad behavior isn't an illness

The grim economics of food stamps

LAX shooting: Have we become numb to mass shootings?

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Religious ConflictsProtestantismReligion and BeliefAntonin Scalia
  • Good and godless: Readers on Sam Harris, atheism and spirituality
    Good and godless: Readers on Sam Harris, atheism and spirituality

    Sam Harris -- author, outspoken atheist and neuroscientist -- has made several appearances on The Times' Op-Ed pages, most recently in an interview with Patt Morrison this week in which he reconciles his practice of "spirituality" with his advocacy of atheism. And as in the past,...

  • No God? No problem, says god-free thinker Sam Harris
    No God? No problem, says god-free thinker Sam Harris

    Sam Harris isn't quite the atheist provocateur that Christopher Hitchens was nor the militant that Richard Dawkins is. But he is building his place in the pantheon of god-free thinkers book by book. His latest is "Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion." As a...

  • The nuns on the bus have a new issue
    The nuns on the bus have a new issue

    This week, Republicans in the Senate blocked a proposed constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, a measure that would have fallen far short of the required two-thirds majority even if there had been a final vote. But fear not. The campaign...

  • If Queen Elizabeth can birth an heir, why can't the Dalai Lama rebirth one?
    If Queen Elizabeth can birth an heir, why can't the Dalai Lama rebirth one?

    Recently, the revered and charismatic Dalai Lama told a German newspaper that there should be no more Dalai Lamas after his death. In other words, this 14th Dalai Lama, who is 79 (and has vowed to live to 113), says he will not be reincarnated as the 15th Dalai Lama. Noting his worldwide...

  • Sorry, Obama, religion has condoned killing innocents
    Sorry, Obama, religion has condoned killing innocents

    Nobody's God says “Hate your neighbor,”

  • Sainthood isn't enough for Salvadoran Archbishop Óscar Romero
    Sainthood isn't enough for Salvadoran Archbishop Óscar Romero

    When Pope Francis announced he was unblocking the canonization process for Salvadoran Archbishop Óscar Romero, killed in 1980 by a death squad during his country's civil war, it was heartening and frustrating. Romero stood up to a murderous army on behalf of the poor in El...

  • Religious rights and gay rights

    Last month, President Obama issued an executive order prohibiting federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Equally notable is what the president didn't do: He refused to exempt religious organizations. That was the right call....

  • Keep politics out of the pulpit

    Under federal law, it is illegal for churches and other so-called 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations to "participate in, or intervene in … any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office." But in recent years the Internal Revenue Service...

Comments
Loading