During the 2014 midterm elections, no one spent political cash like Tom Steyer, the Democratic hedge fund billionaire from San Francisco who has tried to make climate change a paramount issue in American politics.
He dropped more than $74 million into congressional and gubernatorial campaigns, almost three times the $27.7 million spent by the second-biggest individual donor, former New York City
FOR THE RECORD: A previous version of this post said that former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg spent $27.7 billion. The figure is $27.7 million.
The numbers, compiled from documents filed with the federal government, were detailed by Politico this week.
They highlight the ascendancy of Steyer, a wonky environmental activist who can often be found wearing the same plaid tie. By comparison, casino mogul
Much of Steyer’s money was spent through Nextgen Climate Action Committee, his political organization. Despite his deep pockets, however, his ability to push Democrats to victory in the midterms was limited. The
Even though some of his candidates won in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan and New Hampshire, analysts have doubted that climate change was an issue that drove voters to the polls.
Steyer and his allies have defended his political record, saying the 2014 campaigns were just the starting point in a multi-year effort to raise the profile of environmental issues.
After a conference he hosted in Oakland this month, Steyer put a positive spin on the outcome, and he expressed a desire to play an even larger role in the future.
"If you look at the statistics about where we were, how people voted and whether they voted, you'll find out we were very successful," Steyer said. "I look at the last election and say, I'm sorry we weren't in more places."
Steyer, who also donated $284,000 to state campaigns in California this year, also detailed his thoughts on how to keep the environment at the forefront of voters' minds in the future.
"Human beings care about human beings, and they care about local issues, not global issues," he said. "If you wanted to discuss energy and climate with someone, you better be talking about how it affects human beings where they live and who they love."
Steyer added, "If you can't do that, it's not an issue."