Advertisement

Trump administration proposes 3 new national monuments, more changes at existing ones

Share

Eight months after President Trump ordered a review of national monuments, and a day after the president removed 2 million acres of public land from federal protection in Utah, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke on Tuesday announced recommendations for much smaller boundary adjustments to monuments in Nevada and Oregon.

During a conference call with reporters, Zinke said he urged the president to adjust acreage in the 297,000-acre Gold Butte National Monument in Nevada and the 100,000-acre Cascade-Siskiyou monument in Oregon. He described the changes as modest, but did not specify exactly how the boundaries would be revised.

Pilot Rock rises into the clouds in the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument near Lincoln, Ore.
(Jeff Barnard / Associated Press )
Advertisement

One unexpected result of the Interior secretary’s review was his recommendation to establish three new monuments, two in the south to preserve Camp Nelson, a 4,000-acre Civil War training depot in central Kentucky; and the home in Jackson, Miss., of Medgar Evers, the slain civil rights leader. The third is the 130,000-acre Badger-Two Medicine area within Lewis and Clark National Forest in northwestern Montana, close to where Zinke was raised.

The final recommendations Zinke made to President Trump focused on adjusting the boundaries of two Pacific Ocean marine monuments -- the Rose Atoll and the Pacific Remote Islands Monument -- and changing management practices at an Atlantic Ocean monument, the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts. The changes reflect the administration’s desire to open the areas to fishing, which has been limited by the monument designations.

All of the proposed changes are within the president’s authority under the 1906 Antiquities Act to adjust boundaries and management plans, Zinke said. He also said Trump’s directive to review monuments stemmed from concerns by states and neighboring communities that previous administrations had overreached, particularly in establishing the 1.35-million acre Bears Ears and 1.9-million acre Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments in three southern Utah counties.

Zinke said that in certain instances the designation of a national monument had shut down roads and trails, and blocked access to recreational and grazing lands that had been used for generations.

“The Antiquities Act was designed to protect rather than prevent the public use of land,” he said. “No president has the authority to remove the public from their land. The president was absolutely right in asking for a review.”

The administration’s review, particularly the decisions to shrink Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, has received enthusiastic support from cattlemen and rural communities across the West. It has prompted fierce criticism from Democratic lawmakers, Native Americans and environmental groups who assert that Trump does not have the authority to remove so much land from federal protection.

Advertisement
President Trump on Monday signed a proclamation that removed 1.1 million acres of protected federal land from the Bears Ears National Monument in southeast Utah.
(Keith Schneider / Los Angeles Times )

The administration’s monuments review is a sharp departure for American public lands management, which has been distinguished by the steadily evolving doctrine of safeguarding exceptional expanses of the national domain and expanding those protections. Trump is the first president to remove so much ground from federal protection.

Trump promised during his election campaign to disrupt policy conventions, and his decision on Monday to radically alter the boundaries of the two big Utah monuments does just that.

“Beginning with Yellowstone, we have created a national landscape system that is the envy of the world,” said Charles Wilkinson, a law professor and historian at the University of Colorado who is widely recognized as an authority on the West’s development. “Never in our history has there been an assault on our conservation system like this one.”

The president’s proclamations to shrink Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante prompted Native Americans and environmental groups to file multiple lawsuits in federal court this week. Five tribes collaborated to convince President Obama to establish Bears Ears a year ago. The lawsuits are intended to block the president’s directives from taking effect 60 days after they were signed by Trump on Monday in Salt Lake City.

Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah) introduced legislation Tuesday to turn a 100,000-acre section of the president’s smaller Grand Staircase-Escalante into a national park. Zinke said he supported that idea. If Congress embraces the measure, it would establish a sixth national park in Utah.

Advertisement

The monuments review started on April 26 when Trump signed an executive order directing Zinke to study “all presidential designations or expansions of designations under the Antiquities Act” since Jan. 1, 1996, if they involve more than 100,000 acres.

The president said he was intent on responding to longstanding complaints from rural communities in the West who said their opinions were ignored in establishing national monuments, despite a mandate for “adequate public outreach.”

Zinke determined that 22 monuments spanning 11.2 million acres in 11 states, all but one in the West, fit Trump’s description. The review also involved five marine monuments covering hundreds of millions of acres, four of them in the Pacific and the fifth in the Atlantic Ocean.

An August memo from Zinke to Trump recommended that the two Utah monuments, Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, be reduced, along with Gold Butte and Cascade-Siskiyou.

Zinke had also recommended altering the boundaries of two national monuments in New Mexico — Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks and Rio Grande del Norte, and another in Maine — Katahdin Woods and Waters. Zinke said Tuesday that the boundaries of those monuments would remain unchanged.

Among those cheering the administration’s moves was Dave Eliason, president of the Public Lands Council.

Advertisement

“Previous administrations abused the power of the Antiquities Act, designating huge swaths of land as national monuments without any public input or review,” he said. “Rural communities in Utah and across the West have paid the price. Sweeping designations locked up millions of acres of land with the stroke of a pen, undermining local knowledge and decimating rural economies.”

The president said his decision will make it easier to undertake traditional uses of the lands in question, including livestock grazing. That brought praise from the National Cattlemen’s Beef Assn. “Going forward, it is critical that we reform the Antiquities Act to ensure that those whose livelihoods and communities depend on the land have a voice in federal land management decisions,” said Craig Uden, the organization’s president.

ALSO

A county in Utah wants to suck 77 million gallons a day out of Lake Powell, threatening the Colorado River

Supreme Court appears skeptical of Colorado baker’s refusal to make a wedding cake for gay couple

Whatever President Trump has done, it can’t be obstruction of justice, his lawyer argues

Advertisement

Follow Keith Schneider, Western environment and public lands correspondent, on Twitter.

keith.schneider@latimes.com


UPDATES:

2:05 p.m.: This article has been updated with more details on boundary adjustments, quote from a historian, call for new national park.

This article was originally posted at 12:30 p.m.

Advertisement