Advertisement

State Chief of Prisons Says He’s Resigning

Share
Times Staff Writer

Corrections Secretary Roderick Q. Hickman, who embodied Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s vow to turn around California’s violent and scandal-plagued prison system, said Saturday night that he was resigning the post he has held for more than two years.

Hickman, reached by telephone, said that he was calling it quits because he lacked political support for his efforts to create a correctional system that was more than a revolving-door warehouse for felons.

Hickman, 49, said the governor would receive an official letter of resignation Monday.

“I think we’ve built an excellent foundation, but I just don’t see the courage and will we need to get it done across the board in the government of California,” Hickman said.

Advertisement

While he believes Schwarzenegger remains interested in prison reform, Hickman said “the special interests we’re up against are just too powerful to get much done in the current environment.”

He said he had grown increasingly frustrated by legislators who attacked the department -- often during public hearings -- for “small mistakes” that were portrayed as a “massive failure of leadership.”

But he also said the influence the powerful prison guards’ union wields in Sacramento had nudged him toward the door.

The union, the California Correctional Peace Officers Assn., has battled with Hickman from his first days as secretary -- even though he began his career as a prison guard and was a union member for 20 years.

Recently, that battle had intensified as Hickman was approaching a confirmation hearing in the Senate this spring. Though he was confirmed once, legislation that restructured the department last year required he pass a second test.

Hickman, the administration’s highest-ranking African American, said he felt confident he could muster the votes to survive, and Schwarzenegger has professed support for the secretary in the past.

Advertisement

But it was unclear whether the governor’s advisors were behind Hickman.

The departure will leave the governor with an enormous hole in his Cabinet and the daunting task of filling what experts say is the toughest correctional job in the nation.

Hickman is responsible for a sprawling $8.2-billion penal system that incarcerates more than 171,000 youth and adult convicts and employs 59,000 people throughout the state.

He was brought in as a reformer and, from the start, faced immense problems, including severe overcrowding, an aging inmate population that has driven up healthcare costs and an entrenched gang problem that has defied easy solution.

Because of a series of lawsuits, Hickman also was forced to navigate in an environment where large portions of his domain were under court supervision.

Last week, a federal judge appointed a receiver to manage medical care, declaring that outside intervention was essential to solve a long-brewing crisis in which inmates died because of incompetence or neglect at a rate of one a week.

Hickman and Schwarzenegger had attracted national attention, however, for their pledge to reemphasize rehabilitation as a way to increase the odds that parolees would stay crime-free.

Advertisement

As part of a restructuring of the Department of Corrections last year, the governor elevated inmate rehabilitation to equal standing with other prison operations -- a major departure from the past -- and even added “rehabilitation” to the agency’s name.

Hickman also sent deputies around the country to find the most effective inmate programs to determine which would best fit in California.

Those moves were part of his response to criticism of the system as an operation that, while adept at incarcerating convicts, did little to ensure they would not get in trouble again.

With a recidivism rate that was highest in the nation, California was lambasted by experts time and again for a system that wasted tax dollars and, in effect, provided poor public safety because so many parolees committed new crimes.

To help figure out a new approach, Hickman opened the department’s doors to academia, inviting some scholars, such as UC Irvine’s Joan Petersilia, to sit in on meetings with him and his top deputies and offer advice.

More recently, Hickman had attracted attention with new thinking on female offenders, who are housed in expensive, high-security prisons even though most are incarcerated for nonviolent crimes. He was pushing a proposal to move 40% of the state’s female inmates out of prison and into community correctional centers closer to their families.

Advertisement

A physically imposing man with a charismatic style, Hickman has faced criticism from one source more than any other throughout his tenure: the union representing the majority of his employees, the correctional officers. Some say the secretary would have gone further with his reforms had he found a way to work with the union.

Union spokesman Lance Corcoran agreed.

“What is really sad is he had an incredible opportunity to lead this department in a new direction, but he chose to alienate people,” Corcoran said. “Our members are tired, they’re demoralized, we have an unclear chain of command, and the management team ... is in complete disarray. It all happened under Mr. Hickman’s watch.”

Once an insignificant player in the Capitol, the union has grown over the last two decades into one of the most powerful forces in state politics. A generous donor supporting both Democratic and Republican candidates, the union spent more than $1 million to defeat a ballot measure seeking to soften the three-strikes initiative and was a key player in defeating Schwarzenegger’s special-election measures last year.

Union leaders were initially upset over Hickman’s efforts to purge the prisons of the “code of silence,” which the secretary and others said deterred guards from reporting misconduct by colleagues. Union executives said Hickman had wrongly portrayed all officers in the same bad light.

Last year, they blamed Hickman for the death of an officer, Manuel Gonzalez, stabbed by an inmate at the state prison in Chino, noting that the prison had failed to distribute 300 stab-proof vests to guards at the lockup. Corcoran said Hickman’s “philosophy and his lack of leadership” created the climate for the killing, noting, “I’m sticking all of it on Hickman.”

Hickman has declined to comment on the specific attacks but was defiant in one past interview with The Times, saying, “We’re heading in a new direction.... [The union] can get on the train or get left at the station.”

Advertisement

Lawyer Steve Fama, who represents inmates in lawsuits over prison conditions, praised Hickman for “standing up to the union and trying to end the code of silence that too often permeates prisons.”

But he said the secretary’s brief legacy will be marred by his failure to respond more forcefully to the crisis over medical care that has claimed so many lives.

Earlier this month, Hickman faced criticism anew in the Legislature when Sen. Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles) blasted the secretary and other officials during a tense hearing called to assess the department’s progress.

For the first time, Hickman’s patience and enthusiasm seemed to be wearing thin. He left the hearing after testifying, despite Romero’s request that he stay.

Former Undersecretary of Corrections Kevin Carruth, who left the department last year, said the hearing and Romero’s criticism were telling.

“Rod had the courage to come in at a difficult time and try to provide leadership and go in a new direction,” Carruth said. “But the expectations in that place are just unrealistic. They think you can come in, write a memo and turn the place around on a dime. It’s impossible.”

Advertisement
Advertisement