Horan and Murray work for Lamp, the skid row agency that's been trying to help Nathaniel Anthony Ayers. When I bumped into them last week, I had just written about seldom-used California legislation that allows involuntary treatment of people with serious mental illness. I had also said I was coming around to the conclusion that it might be the only way for Nathaniel to get help.
"We're so close," she pleaded, describing their six-month effort to seduce Nathaniel off the streets.
Being forced into treatment against his will, Horan warned, would set him back years and kill any chance of helping him. Just hold on a while longer, pleaded Murray, who has told me for months that Nathaniel would come around "in his own time."
He appears to be ready to at least look at a place to live, they added. Just imagine him with a set of keys to his own place.
The timing of this discussion was fortuitous. We were on a bus with members of the commission established to implement Proposition 63, which will tax California's highest incomes and generate nearly $1 billion a year for mental health services. The commission hopes to leverage a portion of that money to build more than 10,000 housing units over the next 20 years for the likes of Nathaniel, so commissioners came to Los Angeles for a tour of housing options.
"Are we going to end homelessness in three years?" asked Commissioner Darrell Steinberg of Sacramento, a former assemblyman. "No, but we're going to make progress every year."
On the day of the commission's tour, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa unveiled a $50-million plan to help get people off the streets. He also proposed a $1-billion housing bond issue that could aid the legions of Angelenos squeezed out of the real estate market.
The potential impact is enormous, particularly for the mentally ill, who were left to rot on city streets after California shut down mental hospitals and reneged on a promise to build community clinics. But what do you do with the Nathaniels, who are too ill to believe they're sick and too set in their ways to take advantage of the chance to come in from the cold?
Steinberg said that can be overcome with the kind of outreach and intervention that Proposition 63 will fund.
Sounds good. But I told him about being on skid row with Nathaniel and pointing out apartments, none of which interested Nathaniel. No thanks, he said. He wouldn't want to be cooped up. Out on the streets, he said, he's got his freedom.
And all the perils, from drug dealers to bum-bashing and disease. Nathaniel insists he can defend himself with the concealed club he carries and a hubcap he would use as a shield. He's also got the stick he uses to chase away the army of rats.
So how aggressive is this outreach Steinberg is talking about?
He said he wants it to be "in your face" aggressive.
But if comprehensive mental health facilities such as the Village in Long Beach and Lamp in Los Angeles were the models for Proposition 63, is that in-your-face enough for the hard-core resistant population?
"We're very aggressive," said Dick Van Horn, who is on loan to the Proposition 63 commission from the agency that runs the Village. He talked about outreach workers going into the streets again and again to try to lure people in.
In the midst of this discussion, the bus pulled up to Portals, a mental health rehabilitation and housing agency that has been rescuing lives for 50 years. Murray, who used to work there before she moved over to Lamp on skid row, went and got two caseworkers, and they talked about bringing in lots of Nathaniels over the years.
First, they said, you offer food or clothing, then you establish a relationship and earn trust.