OUT THERE

A stoic little town faces tomorrow

A massive housing project may mean the end for Neenach, in the Antelope Valley.
By Scott Gold, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
February 29, 2008
» Discuss Article    (3 Comments)

Sigfried Carrle angled his farmer's hat into a forceful wind roaring across the Antelope Valley. He did not blink, even when a fly bounced off his craggy cheek.

Dust curdled the air and shrouded the sun, and stalks of wheat trembled like the strings of a harp. The sign at Carrle's farm stand on the gravel shoulder of California 138, in the town of Neenach, read: "Last Chance Peaches." The landscape was so bleak it seemed prudent to ask: Before what?

 
But the produce was fresh and plump and grown in Carrle's backyard. So you picked through his crates -- a half-pound of green tomatoes at 50 cents a pound, a pound and a half of Fairtime peaches at $1.25 a pound, and on and on -- until your arms were full of a high school algebra question with no calculator in sight.

"What about five dollars?" Carrle shrugged.

Oh, it should be more than that. . . .

"Yes," Carrle said, then leaned in for effect. "It should, shouldn't it?"

What he meant, on the surface, was that there isn't a place for backyard farmers in modern commerce, that it costs him more to irrigate his tiny orchard than he could ever get for his fruit.

But it was a reminder, too, that the truly rural outposts of Los Angeles County -- the nation's top agricultural county not so long ago -- are withering away. And this one happens to abut the proposed site of the largest planned community in county history.

Neenach -- and a smattering of other forlorn towns hidden between Lancaster and the Grapevine -- will be the subject of a fierce dispute in the coming year over when enough is enough in Southern California.

On one side, advocates will wave studies showing that there are 6 million more people headed this way in the next 20 years, people who will need roofs over their heads. On the other side, activists will point out that once construction starts here -- above the historical northern boundary of the region's development -- there will be nothing to keep "Los Angeles" from turning into a vast, broken metropolis stretching from Tijuana to Bakersfield.

It would all be very apocalyptic-sounding, if only it was the kind of thing that got Neenach bent out of shape.

Life, by design, is gentle and dull here.

Eight hundred people, give or take, live in Neenach. Recreation consists largely of trying to grow a bigger squash than your neighbor or trying to buy his truck. One man races pigeons. The school closed a few years back when they ran out of kids, and its rose-painted walls are still the brightest thing on the prairie.

When the abutting development is built -- if it is built -- it will be called Centennial. It would be the end, for all intents and purposes, of Neenach.

Billed as a "new town," Centennial would be constructed on a chunk of the 165-year-old Tejon Ranch. There would be 23,000 homes, eight elementary schools, three fire stations.

Well aware of the lifestyle they are preparing to upend, managers of the project have launched a spirited marketing campaign to sell Centennial -- not to sell the houses, though that would come soon enough, but to sell the very idea.

They plan to pepper the development with open space and "gathering places" -- civic squares, parks -- intended to foster a small-town feel. Children would be encouraged to walk to school, which would indeed be revolutionary by Southern California standards.

In an effort to make Centennial "self-reliant" -- that's code for cutting down on commuter traffic -- they have pledged to create 30,000 local jobs. More than 1,000 would be required for construction alone: a new house every eight hours, on average, seven days a week, for 20 years.

Environmental advocates, suffice to say, are not impressed.

Ileene Anderson, a biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity, a leading advocacy group opposing the development, said Centennial would be built on rare ecosystems, including the largest swath of native grassland left in California.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion

Share your thoughts on this story and this neighborhood.
 
1. Let's hope it doesn't turn into another ghetto attracting all the low-lives that seem to ruin more and more neighborhoods these days. They're just waiting for this type of developement.
Submitted by: Mary
3:08 PM PDT, Apr 16, 2008
 
2. Talk about leapfrog development. This project is the billboard for sprawl. If this project goes through, LA will never end. I seriously doubt the people that live here will work here. People will still commute to LA everyday, clogging the already congested 5. Plus this area will probably attract the rif raf that Lancaster and Palmdale attract.
Submitted by: Ryan
11:35 PM PDT, Apr 10, 2008
 
3. I am so disgusted with the massive amounts of CHEAPLY BUILT homes pervading Southern California. What happened to pride in craftmanship and concern for the community/environment? I live in the area called "The Lakes", and would absolutely be affected by CHEAP COMMERCIAL HOUSING for indulgent yuppy idiots. Now let's chat about WATER. THERE ISN'T ANY FOLKS. How would you build & supply 23,000 units when there is no more water. Sacramento is gone.... now what? Wait for rain to grade the 23,000 lots? Knuckleheads.
Submitted by: Concerned Country Gal
8:54 AM PDT, Apr 4, 2008
 


More...

The designs of Barclay Butera are showcased at the renovated hotel. Photos
 
A storied party house's pedigreed centerpiece comes with a tale of its own. Photos
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT



One morning's cooking means deliciousness well into the week. Recipe