4th Soldier Guilty in Prison Scandal

A fourth soldier charged in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal has pleaded guilty, and has provided authorities with fresh details on how an Iraqi inmate was dragged naked on a dog leash around the prison near Baghdad, allegedly at the behest of intelligence officers who could not control him.

The photograph of the man on the leash -- one of the indelible images from the Abu Ghraib scandal -- shows Spc. Megan Ambuhl in the background as Pfc. Lynndie R. England holds the leash.

Ambuhl, 30, considered the least culpable of the seven guards and one intelligence officer charged in the case, pleaded guilty Saturday to one count of dereliction of duty for not reporting the dog-leash incident.

As part of a plea agreement reached in Baghdad and disclosed Tuesday by her Washington attorney, Harvey Volzer, Ambuhl forfeited half of one month’s pay of $1,738.30, and was reduced in rank from specialist to private.

She is to cooperate as a government witness in courts-martial proceedings against others accused in the scandal.

According to transcripts of an Oct. 5 interview with Army psychologists, Ambuhl said prison guards were told by military intelligence officers to move the prisoner because they “had another detainee they wanted to put in the hole.”

She said the inmate was labeled “of interest” to intelligence officers and that they personally directed how he was to be treated, either with “soft or harsh” treatment.

Ambuhl’s account bolsters claims by other prison guards that much of the abuse was directed by military intelligence.

Ambuhl’s psychological report states that she arrived in Baghdad with little training on how to treat detainees and no experience as a prison guard. From the outset, she told Lt. Col. Rebecca A. Dyer, a licensed clinical psychologist, she assumed that harsh and humiliating treatment of detainees was acceptable.

For instance, during her initial tour of the facility, “we already saw detainees wearing underwear on their heads,” she told the psychologist. “We just thought it was the standard.”

She told Dyer that the prisoner who was leashed around his neck was extremely uncooperative and appeared to have “mental problems.”

Ambuhl said the man had been kept in a small cell they called “the hole,” an area reserved for combative prisoners. His clothes had been taken away because he was ripping them and tearing them off, she said, and finally intelligence officers instructed guards to move him to make room for another prisoner. Ambuhl at first saw nothing wrong with guards using a leash to drag the man out.

“I just didn’t think about it being wrong at the time,” she said. “We were told to get him out. We had tried to get him to cooperate, but nothing was working.

“These detainees were so difficult, I just didn’t think about it. Then someone put the leash on and got him out,” she said.

Because none of the intelligence officers intervened, she said, she assumed the dragging was done at their request. Her assumption, the psychologist determined, was borne out in notations kept in a prison logbook.

Volzer said Ambuhl would return home to Centreville, Va., but remain an Army reservist in case she is called as a witness in the cases of the four soldiers yet to stand trial.

“You couldn’t ask for a better result than this,” Volzer said, noting that Ambuhl would not serve any prison time.

In contrast, Staff Sgt. Ivan L. “Chip” Frederick II pleaded guilty and was given eight years in prison. Spc. Jeremy C. Sivits pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a year in prison, and Spc. Armin J. Cruz, an intelligence analyst, pleaded guilty and received eight months.

England, the other soldier in the photo of the leashed prisoner, is awaiting court-martial.