Bart Ross spent nearly a decade waiting to be heard, living with a face disfigured by cancer surgery, in constant pain, sinking deeper and deeper into a state of paranoia and growing ever more convinced the medical and judicial systems were out to get him.
People saw the frustration boiling up inside him. He went back and forth to the courts claiming the cancer treatment he underwent in the early 1990s destroyed his life, preventing him from working and causing him to pile up debt and sell his home.
The downward spiral of Ross' life ended Wednesdaywhen he shot himself to death during a traffic stop in Wisconsin, leaving a rambling note that claimed responsibility for the murders of a federal judge's husband and mother.
The judge, Joan Humphrey Lefkow, ruled against Ross four times last year and ultimately dismissed his case. In one of his filings, Ross compared attorneys and state and federal judges to "Nazi-style criminals" and wrote that they "are to me terrorists as much as Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda are terrorists to the United States."
Through hundreds of pages of court filings and an array of different letters, one thing is evident: Ross was desperate to have his case heard, and the fact that no one would listen was making him angrier and angrier.
He was repeatedly rebuffed by attorneys telling him his case had no merit. He tried representing himself, but his cases all got dismissed and his appeals failed.
In 1996, he sent a threatening letter to lawmakers in the Illinois House and Senate: "I would like you all to take into consideration and remember, if you conspire and play this game of law and justice against me for too long, you will bring me to the point of hatred toward you."
In 1999, he sent a petition seeking $25 million in damages to, among others, President Bill Clinton, the entire U.S. Congress, Ross Perot and Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura.
During a hearing in 2003, he accused a judge of committing treason against the United States.
Ross, 57, a Polish immigrant who made a living in Chicago as an electrician, was diagnosed in 1992 with deadly metastatic head and neck cancer. He was treated at the University of Illinois at Chicago Hospital with radiation, but the cancer came back the next year, requiring surgery. Part of Ross' jawbone was removed during the surgery, and his teeth had all been extracted before the radiation treatment.
According to a statement from the hospital released Thursday, Ross "provided full written consent at every step" of the treatment and was declared cancer-free in 1995. Ross filed numerous lawsuits against the hospital, "all of which were dismissed, including the most recent several-hundred-page complaint filed in 2004 alleging federal and state conspiracy to violate his civil rights," the statement read.
In 1996, Ronald S. Scott, a radiation oncologist with the South Coast Tumor Institute in San Diego sought by Ross as a potential expert, wrote a three-page letter saying he had reviewed his medical case and did not see any indication of negligence.
"Indeed, I feel that the treatment you received was technically excellent," Scott wrote. "My concern is your apparent complete lack of acceptance of your condition. I re-emphasize, nothing was done wrong in your treatment."
But Ross remained convinced that the treatment caused him permanent damage. Throughout his court filings, he complained of near-constant pain, writing in 2003 that he was taking morphine, Tylenol with codeine and other pain relievers "24/7 for over a year." He wrote that he could open his mouth only a quarter of an inch, had little control over his lower lip and was unable to "prevent spilling of drinks when drinking and spilling food when eating."
The judges who ruled on Ross' cases were not unsympathetic. Though Lefkow ruled last year that Ross' claims "lack any possible merit," she made note of his "understandably overwhelming frustration" and the tragic turn of events in Ross' life "which have left him physically disfigured, in incessant severe pain and unemployed."
The constant rejection of his claims seemed to feed Ross' conviction that the medical and legal communities were working against him. His case became the focal point of his life, as he abandoned work and sought every judicial avenue possible, including at least two failed attempts to get his case before the U.S. Supreme Court.
According to a federal suit he filed in 2000, Ross "read about 50 medical books" about the treatment of head and neck cancers.
"I can't imagine what this guy's life must have been like. He lived this case," said Barry Bollinger, an attorney who represented the hospital's doctors when Ross filed his malpractice suit in 1995. "He would file literally thousands of pages of documents."
THE LEFKOW MURDERS: THE SUSPECT
Decade of despair boiled over to paranoia
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
Los Angeles Times welcomes civil dialogue about our stories; you must register with the site to participate. We filter comments for language and adherence to our Terms of Service, but not for factual accuracy. By commenting, you agree to these legal terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.
Having technical problems? Check here for guidance.