Archive for Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Rumsfeld Hasn’t Hit a Dead End in Forging Terms for Foe in Iraq
The Pentagon’s long struggle over how to describe the war in Iraq moved to new ground Tuesday as Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said he wanted to retire the term “insurgents” in favor of “enemies of the legitimate Iraqi government.”
Rumsfeld, who has previously described the foe as “deadenders,” “former regime elements” and in other terms, told a Pentagon news conference that the insurgent label lent the enemy “more legitimacy than they seem to merit.” Iraqis now have a constitutional government that offers them legitimate means of political expression, and the foe lacks broad popular support, Rumsfeld argued.
“These people don’t have a legitimate gripe,” he said. “These people aren’t trying to promote something other than disorder
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, an insurgent is “a person who revolts against civil authority or an established government.”
This isn’t the first time the Pentagon has tried to retire such a term.
Immediately after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, American military commanders referred to non-uniformed attackers as the “Saddam Fedayeen,” and then “regime death squads.”
After the military declared an end to initial major combat operations in spring 2003, Rumsfeld began calling them “dead-enders” and “former regime loyalists.” When it was pointed out that the word “loyalists” might have too positive a connotation, the military began calling them “former regime elements.”
But some objected that the acronym – “FRE” – sounded too much like “free.” “Rebels” was also rejected early on as having a neutral, or even slightly positive, connotation.
Separately, a battle broke out this summer at the highest levels of the Bush administration over what to call the larger fight against terrorism.
Rumsfeld and White House national security advisor Stephen Hadley favored changing the name from the “global war on terrorism” (G-WOT) to the “global struggle against violent extremism” (G-SAVE). They contended that the latter name was more accurate because it suggested that the struggle was not exclusively a military matter.
But after an outcry from some conservative commentators, President Bush firmly rejected G-SAVE in favor of retaining G-WOT.
The effort to shift the lexicon is generating confusion among members of the public and military.
Marine Gen. Peter Pace, appearing on the podium with Rumsfeld on Tuesday, slipped and used the term “insurgents” before catching himself in front of his boss.
“I have to use the word ‘insurgent’ because I can’t think of a better word right now,” said Pace, who is chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Later, Pace acknowledged abashedly, “I’m sure I’ll make a mistake and slip back into it.”
- Brazil is pumped up over offshore oil field
- Schwarzenegger outlaws text-messaging while driving
- McCain stands up David Letterman
- Keating 5 ring a bell?
- Pastors plan to defy IRS ban on political speech
- Developers have high hopes for vertical mall in L.A.
- Team of lone rangers scours the new Wild West
- Inside the gates: Pickfair, a legendary Beverly Hills estate is for sale for $60 million
- U.S. engineers sale of WaMu to JPMorgan
- Palin talks to Couric -- and if she's lucky, few are listening
- Oxnard man faces 210-year sentence for sexually abusing Cambodian girls
- No. 1 USC shocked by Oregon State, 27-21
- U.S. engineers sale of WaMu to JPMorgan
- U.S., Pakistan troops exchange fire on Afghanistan border
- Palin talks to Couric -- and if she's lucky, few are listening
- Debate uncertainty keeps the political stakes high
- Reser Stadium has become house of horrors for Trojans
- McCain resurrects an old stunt
- Bailout? Just do nothing
- Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens' corruption trial opens
