Rosa Brooks

If Dubai sneezes, who gets a cold?

Conspicuous consumption by the super-rich fuels more than the U.A.E.'s economy.
Rosa Brooks
November 13, 2008
» Discuss Article    (6 Comments)

So enough about the struggling middle class. In this global financial crisis, how are the really rich holding up?

To find out, I spent several days in Dubai, the most populous city in the United Arab Emirates and world capital of conspicuous consumption.

So far, the ultra-rich are bearing up well. If the scene at Dubai's luxury Burj al Arab hotel is anything to go by, there's still robust demand for hotel rooms that start at about $1,500 a night and bikinis that cost $800. This level of consumption is impressive, especially when you consider that the super-rich must struggle with a serious unemployment problem -- almost none of the designer-clad men and women who grace the Burj al Arab appear to have, uh, jobs. But they cope bravely with this situation, finding in it an opportunity to pay culturally enriching visits to Dubai's many beaches, nightclubs and shopping malls.

OK, for us normal human beings, it's hard not to be revolted by Dubai, which boasts the world's tallest hotel (the aforementioned Burj al Arab, which is shaped like a sailboat and soars in solitary splendor over its own artificial island), one of the world's largest indoor ski slopes and the largest shopping mall in the region. Crammed with cold-eyed Russian oligarchs, coked-out London pop stars and the spoiled princelings of global finance, Dubai is repulsive enough to make most ordinary mortals start rooting for the collapse of global capitalism.

I visited Dubai as a participant in the World Economic Forum's Summit on the Global Agenda, where I was assigned to a working group on "fragile states" -- though in the midst of Dubai's opulence, it felt strange to be discussing the problems of the world's weakest and least stable states (Afghanistan, Congo, Pakistan, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Haiti and the like).

Who can contemplate poverty and war when hot-air balloon trips and visits to the Gold Souk are on offer? Somewhere, no doubt, there were poor people, people dying for lack of basic medical care and militias rampaging through refugee camps, beating, raping and killing those in their way. But not in Dubai.

But even ultra-affluent Dubai is fragile these days. You see, this gem of the postmodern, globalized economy doesn't really produce anything of value -- its oil accounts for only about 5% of gross domestic product. Its economy relies on services, tourism and ... that's about it, actually. Those elaborate hotels, malls, amusement parks and skyscrapers? Heavily leveraged -- built out of the shifting sands and the same intoxicating thin air that sustained Wall Street until recently.

And Dubai may be going down. The oil-rich neighbors that helped finance its boom have seen oil prices plummet, and worldwide, credit for speculative real estate projects is drying up. On Wednesday, the Dubai Financial Market closed lower than at any time in nearly four years; down 61% this year. Sooner or later, even the suntanned loafers here are going to feel the pinch.

I'm tempted to cheer, but unfortunately, the pain won't be confined to the super-rich.

Nearly 80% of the United Arab Emirates' population is made up of migrant laborers brought in to build Dubai's skyscrapers and clean its luxurious hotels. These migrants come from India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Uzbekistan and other poor and fragile regions, and once in Dubai, they work long hours in poor conditions, earning an average of $4 a day.

But it's still more than they'd earn at home, and the wages they send back to their families help fuel development in their own countries. The U.A.E. is the world's third-largest sender of remittances; its migrants send an estimated $6.5 billion to their home countries each year, an amount that rivals (and for some countries dwarfs) formal international development aid. If opportunities in Dubai (and other wealthy, migrant-dependent regions) diminish -- and they will -- many of those migrants will be forced back home, reducing remittances and increasing the pool of labor in fragile states already struggling with high unemployment rates.

The root of the global crisis lies in esoteric financial practices devised by elites, but the fallout will rain down on the globe's poorest states.

On Saturday, Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum -- the prime minister of the U.A.E. and the ruler of Dubai -- reminded World Economic Forum Summit participants that "we live in a global village."

It was a safe cliche. But it was also a polite way to remind the assembled movers and shakers that if Dubai goes down, it will take a lot of others down with it.

rbrooks@latimescolumnists.com





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Comments will close after two days.
 
1. The wealth of places like Dubai is of course built on our dependence on oil. If we had put half the money that has gone into picking up the pieces of 'regime change' investments into green technology, we would be without a big problem and have gained a new green technology base. Instead we are well into a Worldwide Recession and Economic Crisis of unknown duration. And the Dubais of the world seem unlikely to suffer from the WREC as much as we will. Truly, the WREC seems to be having little impact on the 'changed regimes' who are recording budget surpluses. But hey, we can go to Dubai and enjoy some luxury with our last dollars.
Submitted by: Ross
7:04 AM PST, Nov 13, 2008
 
2. Dang. I almost wish Rosa would go back to Bush bashing. What a boring article. Who cares about Dubai! Why don't you write about gays. That seems to be the crisis of the week. Vito
Submitted by: Uncle_vito
6:28 AM PST, Nov 13, 2008
 
3. as long as oil is the primary source for energy for the world and the super rich neighbours have a stake in dubai, they will support Dubai since they are equal partners in this obscene extravaganza. Dubai's loss goes far beyond its borders.
Submitted by: F .Shah, Pakistan
5:30 AM PST, Nov 13, 2008
 





Tim Rutten: Proposals to strip Latino children of their rights as Americans are reprehensible products of the vacuum in Sacramento.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
Zookz: A license to infringe?
Companies that offer downloadable movies and music online without licenses...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
Zookz: A license to infringe?
Companies that offer downloadable movies and music online without licenses...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Recent Columns:
1. Bail out journalism
April 9, 2009
2. Bush's big lies
March 5, 2009
3. How Mom sent a guy to Gitmo
February 26, 2009
4. We need a bailout too
February 19, 2009
5. Wall Street's crybabies
February 12, 2009
>> More Rosa Brooks


ADVERTISEMENT