What should UC be?

Next month, Mark Yudof will take over as president of the massive university system. Here's a preview of what's going into his suggestion box.
May 27, 2008

» Discuss Article    (18 Comments)


Tell Californians the truth

Mark Yudof should level with the people of California, so they understand that only public funding can restore the University of California's tradition of top quality and wide access.

In 2004, UC President Robert Dynes and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger abandoned the idea of a public university in favor of a privatized model. Dynes accepted a $1.5-billion permanent cut in the university's annual $5-billion core operating budget, and agreed to substantially increase tuition every year, in exchange for a promise (now broken) of modest increases in state money while UC sought private money "to support basic programs."

The fee increases don't come close to making up $1.5 billion a year. And although UC has inefficiencies, getting rid of them won't make up the deficit either. Neither will donations or corporate partnerships, which mostly are earmarked for projects, not core costs. (In fact, such "largesse" actually increases core costs.)

The only realistic way to replace public support with private money would be to double the already doubled fees, to $15,000 to $18,000. Alternatively, the university could abandon the equivalent of three campuses.

If the public really understood this situation, the political heat would force Schwarzenegger to restore California's promise of a high-quality, affordable university education.

The test for Yudof is whether he'll have the courage to recognize that California is at a crossroads, stop covering for the governor and tell the truth about privatization.

Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco, chaired the UC Committee on Planning and Budget in 2005-06.

Stand up for undocumented students

During the last four years, UC students have endured two rounds of budget crises, fee increases and a scandal over little-known, lucrative UC executive compensation deals.

But one issue that flies under the radar and affects the relationship between the university and our vast immigrant population is the ongoing controversy over equal access for undocumented immigrant students. Caught in the middle of a nationally polarized debate on immigration, a growing number of highly capable students are being left out of the UC's equation because of the inability of Congress to enact comprehensive immigration reform.

President Yudof needs to take the lead in ensuring that thousands of undocumented students become eligible for financial aid funds to which their tuition fees already contribute. It is not an easy task, but it is one that would demonstrate his leadership and vision.

Matías Ramos, a political science student at UCLA, is a contributor to the book "Underground Undergrads: UCLA Undocumented Immigrant Students Speak Out."





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Add your own idea to incoming UC President Mark Yudof's suggestion box.

Comments will close after two days.
 
1. Look at today’s news. UCLA gave priority to a Japanese Mafia leader for a liver transplant and that’s typical. How is it that foreigners get doctorates from UCLA when they can't speak English while virtually all the local students are deemed unqualified to get in the undergraduate program. The reason is the system is rent with bribery, which is right out in the open. The billion dollars "bonus pool" a few years ago was nothing but a massive slush fund. The reason no criminal investigation was opened is the whole state is involved as well as the LAPD. California is no different than Baja California. The FBI needs to go after this big time.
Submitted by: Frank P
6:37 AM PDT, May 30, 2008
 
2. Raise student fees. Period. Kick out the illegals. Prosecute the admissions officers who permit them entry. (Yes, I know they have academic merit, but it is wrong to admit them when you reject 25,000 qualified citizens.) The UC system has enough money. Get over it.
Submitted by: Rob Martin
2:34 PM PDT, May 29, 2008
 
3. Educational Policy Wonk is only telling part of the story here. The UC data re. Subject tests (2 separate studies): (1) a four-year study which showed that the subject tests are better at predicting FYCGPA than either HSGPA or SAT Reasoning test. More recent study is that Subject tests are better predictor of overall college performance than the SAT Reasoning test. If you are going to eliminate a test, get rid of the SAT Reasoning test, not the SAT Subject tests.
Submitted by: Retain SAT Subject tests
9:25 AM PDT, May 29, 2008
 




Jonah Goldberg: The economy would recover much more quickly without the costly government intervention touted by Obama.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
Prose Ode to My Friend the Poet Laureate
This doggerel no doubt would make her blush; I should therefore zip up my lip...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
Sezmi says: so far, so good
Sezmi, a would-be competitor to cable and satellite television, seemed a bit too...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

From the be-all, end-all turkey recipe to travel tips and gift suggestions, here's a guide to making the most out of this holiday season.