Editorial

Obama's choice on education

Which way Obama will push the nation on schools is unclear, but the priorities must be accountability, funding and learning.
December 12, 2008

» Discuss Article    (19 Comments)

Education was relegated to the outskirts of the presidential campaign this year, always a fourth or fifth runner-up to such pressing matters as the economy, Iraq and healthcare. With few people asking penetrating questions on the issue, Barack Obama was able to sound as though he sided both with traditionalist teachers unions and with accountability-minded reformers.

Now that it's time to name an Education secretary, no one is sure in which direction he's headed. Stanford University professor Linda Darling-Hammond, who was named to Obama's education transition team, is one of the most-mentioned candidates. As a severe critic of the No Child Left Behind Act and an opponent of merit pay for teachers, she is favored by teachers unions. The accountability camp prefers names such as New York schools Chancellor Joel Klein, who has spearheaded large-scale reforms in the nation's largest school district. One side says that what students need are major improvements in health and social services, as well as drastic increases in school funding. The other says that schools wrongly lay the blame for students' low achievement on poverty instead of on lackluster teaching and low expectations.

Both are right. Schools are short the money needed to turn barely literate teenagers into employable young adults, and No Child Left Behind is riddled with faults. It unfairly punishes many schools and has had the effect of narrowing curricula. Yet greater accountability also has led to significant improvements, and new infusions of cash must be contingent on evidence that they result in stronger achievement. Higher pay for teachers? Absolutely -- as long as it's tied to merit pay and an end to tenure.

It would be a shame for the reform movement to lose momentum at this point. For all of its weaknesses, the federal accountability law has pushed schools into higher gear. For more than a decade, this country's students ranked in the middle among industrialized nations in math. In the most recent round of testing, they were in the top third, the result of focused math instruction backed up by regular testing. In addition, Darling-Hammond's early attacks on Teach for America, a nonprofit organization that recruits some of the brightest college graduates into the teaching profession, give us little confidence that she would support innovative approaches to education.

At the same time, reformers must be open to how badly No Child Left Behind itself needs reform. After years of public battering, schools need a leader who is less an ideologue than a pragmatist, who puts children ahead of both union and political priorities.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion

Comments are closed.
 
1. This article focuses on what Linda Darling-Hammond purpotedly is against, but syas littel about what she is for. Of course, Darling-Hammond is concerned about the underfudning of public schools. But this is one piece of a larger, coherent plan for transforming schools that includes truly improving the quality of the teaching and learning experience, improving assessments so that accountability is based on meaningful tools, and making sure schools use equitable practices that enable students from all groups to succeed. If these priorities are not part of real and far-reaching reform, then I don't know what is.
Submitted by: Susan Sandler
3:39 PM PST, Dec 12, 2008
 
2. Here we go again. Money, recruiting the brightest graduates to go into the teaching profession, and a greater knoweldge of math will not solve the problems of transfering knowledge to students. The solution is to first recognize that the teachers need to understand the teaching process. How does one transfer knowledge successfully. Until we solve this problem we will continue to fail and no amount of money in the world will help. Money does not cause a student to know or make a teacher successful. Can for once we start at the beginning. We might want to listen to the old cowboy. If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging!
Submitted by: Don Hutson
3:08 PM PST, Dec 12, 2008
 
3. To say the selection of Linda Darling-Hammond gives "little confidence that she would support innovative approaches to education" is ridiculous. Look up Darling-Hammond's research and you will find one of the most forward thinking ideas on education. Look at her support for Small School or Small Learning Communities. This allows students to not get lost in the big high schools and also receive a rigorous education. Look at the Humanitas Small Learning Communities in the district. Just because Darling-Hammond made some comments about Teach for America, does not mean that she does not support innovative change.
Submitted by: LAUSD Teacher
2:41 PM PST, Dec 12, 2008
 




The U.S. needs to create a system that responds to labor market needs, provides more effective enforcement and offers a fair way to deal with those living here illegally.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
Play Supreme Court confirmation at home!
As I sat listening to Sen. Orrin Hatch's (predictable) opening remarks at...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
SuperFan, taking affinities further
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT