Editorial

The homeless and hate crimes

Constantly expanding the hate crime category will eventually make it meaningless.
October 30, 2008

» Discuss Article    (7 Comments)

The murder of John Robert McGraham, the Los Angeles homeless man who was set on fire this month, was a hateful crime. But was it also a hate crime, deserving of the additional punishment meted out to those who choose their victims on the basis of race or religion? Our answer is no.

According to the National Commission for the Homeless and the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty, California saw 22 attacks on homeless people last year, the second-highest number in the nation. By comparison, there were 932 racially motivated hate crimes reported in the state in 2007.

It's outrageous that the homeless, a vulnerable and often mentally ill population, are tormented, beaten and even killed. If McGraham's murderer is located and convicted, he should be sentenced to life in prison without parole. But advocates for the homeless want more. They are supporting two bills in Congress: One :h2216ih.txt.pdf would require the Justice Department to compile statistics about attacks against the homeless, as it does with those rooted in "manifest prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity"; the other:h2217ih.txt.pdf would direct the U.S. Sentencing Commission to allow for extra prison time for crimes against the homeless.

If Congress determines that crimes against the homeless are a national problem that the FBI should track, it's hard to object. More troubling is the idea of a so-called piggyback hate-crime law in which someone who assaults a homeless person can be punished more severely than if, with equal violence, he attacks someone on the street who is traveling to his home.

Activists who support a "homeless" category of hate crime believe that it would have symbolic value in affirming the dignity of the homeless and stigmatizing those who mistreat them. That, rather than any dissatisfaction with the way police now deal with such attacks, seems to be their overriding justification. The problem is that other groups may decide that attacks on their members are likewise not taken seriously if the hate-crime label isn't affixed to them.

This already has happened at the federal level, with a controversy about whether legislation expanding a hate-crime law to cover violence against gays and lesbians should also target "bias crimes" based on disability. An attack on someone in a wheelchair is as despicable as an attack on a homeless person, but it isn't rooted in the sort of pervasive discrimination experienced by racial, religious and other minorities.

Ignoring this fact could lead to a situation in which every crime is a hate crime -- and none is.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Comments will be accepted all day Thursday.
 
1. you all know where hate crimes come from...but i guess it reminds you of the ugly past that you all try to live in denial about......it was similar to what affirmative action was for......discrimination against people of color...don't play nieve.......
Submitted by: Kevin
4:39 PM PDT, Oct 30, 2008
 
2. We cannot read someone's mind. If a someone kills a person because of the victim's race but doesn't say anything, it's a regular crime. If the assailant uttered a phrase related to religion, sex, etc., then it becomes a hate crime. It makes no sense.
Submitted by: kristin
3:59 PM PDT, Oct 30, 2008
 
3. I loathe, despise and detest 'hate crimes.' They are the slippery slope of political subjectivity corrupting the criminal justice system. When we move from punishing acts to punishing 'minds,' we place all our liberties in peril. Yes, I understand 'mens rea,' but this reflects the degree of premeditation, not predisposition. The cruel blow or bullet from the calculating psychopath is every bit as painful, potentially devastating and reprehensible as that from the bigot. Let's punish all their acts even handedly.
Submitted by: DF Tweedie, PhD
10:42 AM PDT, Oct 30, 2008
 





The author talks about his youth in an orphanage, his latest book on the story of California, and the state's current budget mess.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: How the budget got this bad. Oh, yes, and Jacko, of course
An international accord on global warming? The editorial board celebrates,...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
SuperFan, taking affinities further
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT