That's not to deny the progress this nation is making. Legislatures and courts in several states have understood that same-sex marriage does more than strengthen families and the institution of marriage; it is an essential right. On the same day that Maine rejected same-sex marriage, Washington state voters appeared to approve giving gays and lesbians in domestic partnerships the same practical rights as married couples. Newly approved federal law recognizes that crimes committed because of the victim's sexual orientation are hate crimes; next on the federal agenda is ending employment discrimination against gays and lesbians.
Still, we now know that it will take more than well-prepared arguments and savvily run campaigns to bring about wider victory for same-sex marriage. Lifelong marriage traditions and deeply held religious beliefs have a strong grip on many voters. Younger people, who have grown up in a world of greater societal tolerance of different sexual orientations, are far more likely to vote for gay marriage. But even that greater acceptance came about only through years of gay-rights struggle -- legal, legislative and cultural.
The Maine experience indicates that this struggle continues uphill -- and it can't afford to pause now. Gays and lesbians shouldn't have to wait for an entire generation to reach voting age in order to receive equal rights.
Digg
Twitter
Facebook
StumbleUpon
No pabrown51....it's that a minority of people shouldn't force the majority to change something. You also can't say it's the same thing, because clearly the participants are different. Instead, a committed gay relationship is something else, and clearly can't become married. They can enter into a union or something else that they define...but they don't have any right to redefine what the rest of us consider marriage.
Notice I didn't say anything about rights either. They can have all the rights they want...but they don't need to redefine marriage to do that.
nathan118 (11/10/2009, 6:38 AM )