Comment have closed.
No further comments will be accepted.
From the Los Angeles Times
| Advertisement |
|
|
No further comments will be accepted.
From the Los Angeles Times
| Advertisement |
|
|
Save more than
Contrary to some comments here critizing this editorial, I find it both thoughtful and insightful. Moving in the direction of a global economy, the US needs the right perspective, goals and strategies to succeed. We can't continue to take the view that we can take advantage of the world, and not think that other nations shouldn't be able follow a similar path that serves their interests.
steveC @ 2:18 PM PST, Nov 26, 2008
bush the bumbler has made a mess of U.S./Russian relations. we should have good relations with Russia, but the bush admin. chose bluster.
nyet @ 1:08 PM PST, Nov 26, 2008
Who could care less about Russian missiles? MAD renders nukes useless, that is unless your insane.
Gregory M @ 12:07 PM PST, Nov 26, 2008
"not aimed at Latin America, but a country just north of Mexico"... Texas?
Veniamin Nikolayev @ 10:29 AM PST, Nov 26, 2008
It's convenient for Russia to have its rivals consider it weak. Go ahead, continue thinking that Russian navy is in bad condition and that Russian rockets are covered with rust. Do you realize that no one knows exactly how many nuclear missiles Russia has and where are they located?? Do you know how many mobile Topol-Ms there are in the Russian woods, do you know how many underground missile silos there are? "saber-rattling"? I don't think so.
ragozzi @ 10:13 AM PST, Nov 26, 2008
So if you are not scary, then don't write this nonsense. Why bother?
Vlad @ 9:00 AM PST, Nov 26, 2008
A very accurate analysis.The "Monroe Doctrine" has been challenged. To handle it appropriately, we should first have a truthful, unbiased analysis of our history and relationship with the rest of the world, and especially the Americas. Maybe it is time to leave the Monroe Doctrine behind and start fresh with South/Latin America, with humility, genuine friendship, mutually beneficial relationship, capitalizing upon our good and strong points. This is not weakness, but may be strategically more correct.
Lib Rozario @ 8:17 AM PST, Nov 26, 2008
REALLY? the TRUTH is exactly the OPPOSITE of whet you like your readers to believe with your PROPAGANDA piece. you replace russia with us and chavez with any number of murderous us stooges with you have somthing VERY close to the actual thruth. But i'm not holding my breath that going to happen anytime soon in your so called paper.
joe @ 7:40 AM PST, Nov 26, 2008
Simply, Uff! I never though that LA times would make such bad analyses, plety of insults and wrong statements
Miguel @ 2:59 AM PST, Nov 26, 2008
"a cruiser called Peter the Great, was said in 2004 by Russia's naval commander to be in such bad condition that it could explode at any moment" It simply nonsense.
metall @ 2:55 AM PST, Nov 26, 2008