The Declaration of Independence, reloaded

What truths are still self-evident after 232 years?
July 4, 2008

» Discuss Article    (7 Comments)

When you've spent as many hours unpacking the text of the nation's founding documents as we have, you start to notice how many concerns that were pressing when the United States was founded remain unresolved today. This is obvious with the U.S. Constitution, most of whose clauses — even, we discovered, the relatively unsung 3rd Amendment — have come up for judicial workouts within living memory.

But you can still find modern relevance and ancient puzzles even in the poison-pen letter the founders sent off to King George III on this day more than two centuries ago. Herewith, a more permeable Declaration of Independence, linked to 232 years worth of trouble but focusing mainly on the questions, controversies and goofs that are still with us. This exercise may strike some (or if we're lucky, all) readers as infuriating or tendentious, but our purpose is not to prove any political point, nor is it to build a case for or against any current leaders. If we have a goal (beyond having some fun with history), it's to show how even the most widely agreed upon national narratives can still foment the kind of discord that fuels both journalism and democracy.


IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Discuss this annotated Declaration of Independence.

Comments will close after one week.
 
1. It seems that the underlined blue words & sentences correlate directly with what our illustrious Pres. Bush has been doing while in office, for the past eight years. Since the Colonists waged the American Revolutionary War to be rid of the king of England, then maybe we, as citizens of the USA, should do the same to be rid of Bush, his administration, & all the other members of Congress, since 99% of Rep., & some Dems, are following in Mr. Bush's path. We need to elect ALL BRAND NEW Congressional members, who will STRICTLY adhere to the Constitution of the United States, as was adopted by our forefathers back in July of 1776.
Submitted by: Barbara P.
9:36 PM PDT, Jul 4, 2008
 
2. Cont: What Impresses: Why did they do it? A genuine sense of revulsion to the status quo that was being offered? Their dilemma was and is the ancient dilemma of letting the rope be slowly placed around ones neck vs. overreacting to misunderstood or illusionary forces. They acted, and this country became wealthy as a direct result.
Submitted by: Arnie
9:07 PM PDT, Jul 4, 2008
 
3. What impresses me about the events of that time is the courage of these people. The signers of this document were all successful business people of their time, and yet they took the big risk to make it known to the powers that be just what they thought of their ethical standards. They surely knew what response would be intended for them.
Submitted by: Arnie
9:07 PM PDT, Jul 4, 2008
 





The author talks about his youth in an orphanage, his latest book on the story of California, and the state's current budget mess.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: How the budget got this bad. Oh, yes, and Jacko, of course
An international accord on global warming? The editorial board celebrates,...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
SuperFan, taking affinities further
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT