California | Local
National
World
Business
Sports
Washington
Science
Environment
Opinion
Entertainment The Hot List Company Town Arts & Culture Calendar The Envelope TV Listings Movie Showtimes
Travel Health Autos Home & Garden Food Image Books Brand X Magazine
Data Desk
Photography
Obituaries
Crosswords/Sudoku
Your Scene
Blogs
Columnists
Print Edition
Readers Rep
Corrections
All Sections
Buy, Sell & More Jobs Cars latcars Real Estate Foreclosure Sale Rentals Personals Local Values Coupons Newspaper Ads
Place an Ad In the Newspaper Online
Settings/Services Sign In Register E-Mail Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Help
Contact Us
L.A. Times Archives
Reprint Requests
Work for Us
Home Delivery Customer Support Subscribe
Entertainment The Hot List Company Town Arts & Culture Calendar The Envelope TV Listings Movie Showtimes
Travel Health Autos Home & Garden Food Image Books Brand X Magazine
Buy, Sell & More Jobs Cars latcars Real Estate Foreclosure Sale Rentals Personals Local Values Coupons Newspaper Ads
Place an Ad In the Newspaper Online
Settings/Services Sign In Register E-Mail Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Help
Contact Us
L.A. Times Archives
Reprint Requests
Work for Us
Home Delivery Customer Support Subscribe
Editorial
California GOP's no-tax-hike pledge
In swearing not to raise taxes, Republican legislators are forgetting their oath to serve the people.
» Discuss Article
(64 Comments)
Republican members of the Assembly and state Senate signed pledges to oppose any tax increase, and so far they have not moved from that position. One result is that California has a budget billions of dollars out of balance. Schools must cut education programs, physicians who treat patients eligible for Medi-Cal are going unpaid, many bond-funded construction projects have been halted and the state's credit rating is in jeopardy.
GOP lawmakers don't bear the sole blame for these catastrophes, because higher taxes are not and should never be deemed the automatic government response to an economic downturn. In fact, Republican lawmakers are correct when they argue that higher taxes can slow recovery at just the time the state needs to juice the economic machinery. But that argument frames what ought to be Republicans' main point: not that taxes must be avoided at all costs but that Sacramento must protect Californians and get the economy moving.
GOP lawmakers don't bear the sole blame for these catastrophes, because higher taxes are not and should never be deemed the automatic government response to an economic downturn. In fact, Republican lawmakers are correct when they argue that higher taxes can slow recovery at just the time the state needs to juice the economic machinery. But that argument frames what ought to be Republicans' main point: not that taxes must be avoided at all costs but that Sacramento must protect Californians and get the economy moving.
The no-tax pledge, or, more formally, the Taxpayer Protection Pledge -- originated and monitored by Republican lobbyist Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform -- blindly promotes one policy position over the interests of the economy and even taxpayers. It's the wrong pledge.
In taking their official oaths, lawmakers are required to promise to support and defend the U.S. and state constitutions and swear that they aren't part of an organization committed to violent overthrow of the government. But by running for and taking office, they imply more than that. They commit themselves to serving the best interests of their constituents and the state.
California is facing something worse than higher taxes. The effect of a cutoff in state payments to workers who must stop building and maintaining roads, bridges, schools and waterworks would do more than simply undermine voters' intent in authorizing bonds and preparing for the future. It also would keep the workers from pumping their pay back into the economy and the corresponding tax money into state coffers. The same is true of the thousands of teachers and others who inevitably will be laid off if the state fails to come up with more revenue.
In taking their official oaths, lawmakers are required to promise to support and defend the U.S. and state constitutions and swear that they aren't part of an organization committed to violent overthrow of the government. But by running for and taking office, they imply more than that. They commit themselves to serving the best interests of their constituents and the state.
California is facing something worse than higher taxes. The effect of a cutoff in state payments to workers who must stop building and maintaining roads, bridges, schools and waterworks would do more than simply undermine voters' intent in authorizing bonds and preparing for the future. It also would keep the workers from pumping their pay back into the economy and the corresponding tax money into state coffers. The same is true of the thousands of teachers and others who inevitably will be laid off if the state fails to come up with more revenue.
If they must, Republican lawmakers can forget the growing number of Californians who need the very services now on the chopping block. They can concentrate instead on the additional money that even deeper cuts will take out of the economy and see that modest or temporary tax increases will serve California better. Pledging to protect the economic health and general welfare of Californians should take precedence over the candidate ratings and scorecards put out by anti-tax groups.
|
Post Comment |
Discussion Comments will be accepted throughout the day Tuesday.
1. Here's the solution that the Repubs should embrace that will solve all out state problems: Put ex-President Bush & all his Fed co-conspirators in charge of the California economy, effective Jan. 21, 2009:
Their experience in implementing the Republican philosophy of tax cuts for the richest donors; lax regulation; farming out of essential services to "private sector" crooks; and record breaking borrowing to fund misguided programs.
This will solve all our problems, right?
Submitted by: Herb Harrison 11:35 PM PST, Dec 30, 2008 Submitted by: Radical Raul 11:16 PM PST, Dec 30, 2008 Submitted by: conservative 8:40 PM PST, Dec 30, 2008 |
|
OPINION »
Jonah Goldberg: Citing recently published comments, the columnist wonders whether the justice believes some populations need to be reduced through abortion.
Op-Ed: The NSA's cyber overkill |
 |
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: reform. Reform of the health care system, reform of...
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
For all the hype about the "remix culture," I'm skeptical of the notion that the...
|
||
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
National Headlines
