A feminist house divided?
Discuss round four of this week's Dust-Up.
Comments will close after one week.
From the Los Angeles Times
| Advertisement |
|
|
The Latest | news as it happens
- Tuesday's poll: Who is the best pound-for-pound boxer of all time? - The Fabulous Forum 11/16/2009, 9:49 p.m.
- 'Twilight': Robert Pattinson says fans can believe the 'New Moon' hype! The movie rocks! - The Dish Rag 11/16/2009, 9:46 p.m.
- Kings rally past Panthers - L.A. Times - Sports 11/16/2009, 9:46 p.m.
- Football: Hemet coach is fired - Varsity Times Insider 11/16/2009, 9:45 p.m.
- VIDEO: Taylor Lautner on what the wolf pack adds to New Moon: abs and action! - The Dish Rag 11/16/2009, 9:44 p.m.
Save more than
It's easy to skate over sexism and say humanism is the future. You have to acknowledge injustice to get past it and that's what the feminist movement is about. I see injustice on the basis of gender all the time--while it's not still enshrined into law, the attitudes still exist.
Tina @ 5:49 PM PDT, Jun 6, 2008
Feminism is polarizing and passe. Humanism, which is gender blind, color blind, orientation blind, etc., is the future.
Chris @ 8:23 PM PDT, Jun 5, 2008
One thing not discussed in the gap between different waves of feminism is the very real conflict that feminists of color have with feminist organizations that downplay or ignore race in their analysis, and don't ask how racial justice might contribute to feminism.
Greg @ 1:48 PM PDT, Jun 5, 2008