DUST-UP

L.A. without the LAT

Patrick Frey says Southern California would get along fine without the Los Angeles Times. Marc Cooper predicts a future in which The Times' brand of journalism will appeal to a niche market.
July 8, 2008

» Discuss Article    (49 Comments)

Today's question: Should Southern California prepare for a future without the L.A. Times? What might that future look like? Previously, Frey and Cooper diagnosed the paper's most pressing problems.

Adapt or die — it's up to the L.A. Times

Marc,

A future without the L.A. Times would be unthinkable. Bird cages across the Southland would go unlined. Dogs would have nothing on which to train. Fish would go unwrapped in countless Southern California households.

I kid! I kid because I love.

Seriously, though, I have no doubt that the editors of The Times think that their paper is the glue that holds the Southland together. I hate to break it to you, editors, but we could get along just fine without you.

On Monday, we learned that reporters Charles Ornstein and Tracy Weber are leaving the newspaper. Ironically, just yesterday in this space, I was praising their series on the Martin Luther King Jr-Harbor Hospital. The loss of these talented reporters is indeed a hard blow to The Times. But we'll still be able to read Ornstein and Weber in a Web-based journalism start-up. They're becoming part of the Internet-driven revolution in news gathering that is challenging dinosaur media like The Times.

Southern California can live without The Times. In fact, in many cases, local journalism already runs rings around this newspaper.

Take the L.A. Weekly, for example, which helped reveal the true facts of the Tennie Pierce case while The Times slept.

The Weekly exposed the laughable naivete of a 2005 Times article lionizing an alleged "former gang member" supposedly turned "man of peace." The Weekly's secret trick? Talking to law enforcement!

The Weekly printed an excellent piece about gang warfare in housing projects. Meanwhile, The Times couldn't be bothered to run one line on the shooting death of a teenager in Compton. Yet somehow, the paper found room for a dozen stories about Paris Hilton's jail sentence.

The Weekly covered the criminal trial of local civil rights attorney Stephen Yagman, while The Times was nearly AWOL.

Just last month, the Weekly published an excellent piece about the U.S.-Mexico border and the border fence. The piece was alive with detail, better than any immigration piece I've seen in The Times. If this sounds familiar, it should. The Weekly reporter is a fellow named Marc Cooper.

The Weekly is hardly the only competing outlet. The Daily News broke the story about Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's affair. L.A.'s top newspaper got scooped on that one too.

Marc, there's no shortage of talented local journalists ready to deliver the news. The competition stands ready to appropriate available talent and fill any void that might be caused by the demise of The Times.

A larger newspaper has advantages such as institutional expertise and massive resources. But for The Times, those advantages are coupled with a hidebound arrogance, born of years of existence as a monopoly.

To adapt, it's critical to shake off that insolence. Times editors, be honest with your readers. Listen to your readers. Stop assuming you're the smartest people around. You're smart. So is the competition. But you can beat the competition if you recognize that your readers are smarter than you and the competition combined. Recognize that and turn it to your advantage.

It's your choice, L.A. Times. Adapt or die.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Discuss round two of this week's Dust-Up.

Comments will close after one week.
 
1. Jay #3: "I love the fact that so many comments are from ultra-conservatives who would like nothing better than to see the LAT die. How did they get here in the first place, they had to read it." LOL. We came from links to it at Patrick's blog (and others', as well). Welcome to the internet, Jay!
Submitted by: Beth
6:41 PM PDT, Jul 13, 2008
 
2. Rosa brooks, Meghan Daum, Patt Morrison, Tim Rutten, James Rainey, et al. - Instead of writing separate columns this group should just issue a joint communiqué every week. The LAT might be able to find success as a large progressive blog, in the mold of HuffPo. Since the HuffPo writers are not coy about their progressive politics they are obliged to engage contrary opinions head on. This makes the blog more interesting than the Times, which lazily presents one side of every issue as if it were the objective truth without the inconvenience of having to defend it from challenge.
Submitted by: Aldo
9:11 AM PDT, Jul 13, 2008
 
3. I stopped reading the LA Times about 15 years ago and I've never missed it. They are a sloppy, arrogant, insolent bunch. I look forward to the day that they go belly up.
Submitted by: trentk269
10:06 PM PDT, Jul 12, 2008
 





The author talks about his youth in an orphanage, his latest book on the story of California, and the state's current budget mess.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: How the budget got this bad. Oh, yes, and Jacko, of course
An international accord on global warming? The editorial board celebrates,...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
SuperFan, taking affinities further
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT