Letters to the editor

May 5, 2008

Hysteria over gasoline tax

Re "Empty promises," editorial, April 30

Congratulations to The Times for recognizing that the proposals for federal gas-tax suspension are political hysteria. However, The Times could have been really brave and advocated a federal gas-tax increase.

Congress had a chance in the late 1970s to encourage the use of low-mileage vehicles. A significant increase in the gas tax at that time would have accelerated the development, manufacture and sale of hybrid and electric vehicles. This is not a new idea. On Sept. 11, 1979, The Times published an Op-Ed article by Robert J. Samuelson titled "Why Not a New Gasoline Tax?" Notice the date. I submit that it's never too late to think about the future and do the rational thing.

Peter E. Rentz

Granada Hills



Your editorial was right on the mark. John McCain has at least a lame excuse -- he already told Americans that he didn't know much about economics, and since then he has done his best to prove it.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, on the other hand, knows enough about economics but can't resist pandering to the desperate and ignorant who might throw votes her way if they think they might save a few cents on gasoline.

In a more realistic political system, both of these candidates would be disqualified immediately as presidential material.

Gary Peters

Paso Robles

Celebrity justices

Re "High court is no longer above meeting the press," May 1

Public appearances by the U.S. Supreme Court justices reflect the celebrity culture of our times; they have nothing to do with "transparency" of the court. The appearances are not a good thing, just as cameras in the courtroom are not a good thing.

Inevitably, the media create a circus, elevating everything and elucidating nothing. The more appearances the justices perform (yes, it's a performance), the more lawyers will pander to the justices' personalities, demeaning their clients and the law. The more exposure the justices receive, the more exposed they become to risk of harm (yes, physical harm).

The founders created the position of federal judgeship for life to immunize the judges from politics and plebeian influences and distractions. Regrettably, when the chief justice is young enough to be swept in by YouTube and Facebook culture, cameras in the court will not be far behind.

Stephany Yablow

North Hollywood








The senator's Berlin speech was radical and naive.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism, Monday through Friday
Former Timesman finally makes good
At the L.A. Times it often seems that the only kind of colleagues we have are...
more »
Jon Healey on Hollywood's love-hate relationship with technology.
A Paramount movie integrated into Sony web programming
This is so meta, I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around it. Today Bebo...
more »
 

ADVERTISEMENT



The Tottori Sand Museum in Japan is showcasing sculptures of UNESCO World Heritage sites in Asia.