Steve Lopez pokes a great deal of fun at the design and scope of L.A.'s new public high school for the arts.

What Lopez ought to be comparing it to is the average public school: an unimaginative edifice that could never spark the exploration and invention we so desperately need in our schools. That is why I strongly support the efforts of Eli Broad and L.A. Unified Supt. David L. Brewer to build an arts high school that is also a bold piece of public architecture.

Yes, as Lopez states, a high school could have been built for far less. But not an extraordinary arts campus with a soaring tower and a world-class theater; not a school that is as dynamic and interactive as arts education must be. And shouldn't Los Angeles, one of the world's capitals of the arts, start taking arts education far more seriously?

As for Lopez's view of the building's design, I can only note that Pablo Picasso and Henri Matisse were first met with criticism. Yet we are still talking about their work, still challenged and inspired by it -- which is more than we can say for the public schools built in their lifetimes.

Wallis Annenberg

Los Angeles



Lopez completely misses the point. Yes, Broad's heavy-handed influence should have been kept out of the school construction process, but the Los Angeles Board of Education allowed him to essentially redesign the school, which delayed the project for years and easily added more than $100 million to the project's cost.

The responsibility for this waste rests clearly with the school board members, whose failure of proper oversight permitted this to happen.

Charlotte Meyer

Calabasas



In the architectural desert called Los Angeles, where a few masterpieces are buried in the provincial, nondescript junk, one should welcome a bold gesture. Lopez finds it to be a "towering absurdity." Does he find the typical L.A. Unified barracks more attractive and inspiring for the gifted kids?

There is one point, however, on which I agree with Lopez: Let Broad cough up $230 million and rename the school Eli High.

Vladimir Paperny

Marina del Rey

Don't blame Georgia

Re "Trouble in Georgia," editorial, May 5

Your evenhandedness in assessing the Georgia-Russia dispute is unwarranted. As you note, Russia is retaliating against Georgia for the latter's impudence in seeking to join NATO. But Georgia is not "fighting dirty." Stalling Russia's World Trade Organization accession is a perfectly legitimate tactic, as Russia frequently uses trade as a weapon against its neighbors; Georgia has no desire to forever bar Russia's entry.

OPINION » DUST-UP: ECONOMANIA How much more pain? Steven Landsburg says owners are walking away. Doug Henwood says it's not that simple. Discuss  << TUESDAY: Blame oil speculators? Discuss EDITORIALS|OP-ED|LETTERS				FROM THE BLOGS Opinion L.A. Opinion L.A. The best in Southern California opinion journalism, Monday through Friday Should he? Would he? Could he? Wed, July 23, 2008 | 7:05:45 PM PDT California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger cuts state workers' pay to minimum wage;... more » Bit Player By Jon Healey Bit Player Jon Healey on Hollywood's love-hate relationship with technology. Yahoo pulls an MSN Music (only faster) Wed, July 23, 2008 | 6:23:55 PM PDT This afternoon, Yahoo alerted customers of its erstwhile downloadable music... more »