What porn says about the man

Why is it no surprise to learn that LA Times reporters did not fact check or accurately report a story to fit an agenda or try and create controversy. ( I think I see a trend). The Times is hurting bad and they know it, but they don't want to admit it. They have lost all credibility and are losing subscriptions and money. IN FACT, I just noticed a sign hanging on their parking structure advertising public monthly parking in their parking structure... LOL...

Cindy @ 11:29 PM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

Rob in Ottawa, you haven't been paying attention. The material was NOT porn -- it was "funny" (or supposed to be.) I see no reason to get into a discussion of the harm "funny" does to women, or anyone else.

Linda @ 6:38 PM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

Not that it's okay, Rob; merely that it's a protected right of both producers and consumers, including judges.

John Wright @ 4:11 PM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

Actually I thought it was an old excerpt from the Benny Hill Show. Move on this is nonsense.

Michael in LA @ 3:18 PM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

So are out of shape, unatractive, no game people losers? I don't think so. Porn is for those who want sexual arouseal. Even married men watch porn, just because men were programed and devleoped for want to have sex all the time, and women were programed not to think and want sex all the time. Cause if women were like men the world populaion would be 6 Trillion. Every man want to be in porn but don't because it's look at as something evile, when is not intirley. And Im talking about stright porn not the freaky stuff. That's for losers.

Wake up people @ 1:05 PM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

Nothing at all about the harm porn does to women. A man judging others has no connection to the reality of the industry? And the editors of LAT spread the word to the next generation that paying women to have men treat them like meat is okay.

Rob in Ottawa @ 10:57 AM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

Porn is, for the most part, harmless entertainment. It's legal. For some people, men AND women, it's the only possible source of sexual gratification. I'd be FAR more worried if the good judge had no porn. That would seem unnatural.

david @ 9:41 AM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

I don't have any porn on my computer because I consider it a silly, pointless waste of time/money for a grown man to surf porn. So I'm not normal? Porn should be legal, agree, but let's not hold a parade for it, it's for losers. Period.

Brian @ 8:22 AM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

I had this discussion with afemale coworker of mine. You can't get 10 men, gay or straight, in one place, even at work, with high speed internet access and not have at least one of them looking at porn. You just can't.

liz @ 8:21 AM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

If the porn was on his work computer, this is an issue between him and his bosses and no one else. If it was on his home computer, it's his business and no one else's. End of story.

John Middleton @ 8:20 AM PDT, Jun 19, 2008

Next