DUST-UP

The new scarcity?

Oil, water, food and even arable land all seem to be either spiking in price or otherwise showing signs of peak supply. Is the United States entering a new era of scarcity? Is the world? The Worldwatch Institute’s Gary Gardner debates author and UC Davis economist Gregory Clark.
May 5, 2008

» Discuss Article    (7 Comments)

Gardner and Clark begin their Dust-Up today with a debate on current trends in resource supply and demand, and whether they portend a future of global scarcity. Later in the week, they'll discuss the emergence of China and India as major resource consumers, government policies aimed at altering consumption habits and more.

Our demand for resources cannot be sustained

Gregory,

Former World Bank economist Herman Daly has used the term "full world" to describe an increasingly crowded planet whose people demand ever more materials and energy. I like the term because it neatly sums up this stage of our civilization. If the 20th century were an era of resource-intensive expansion and new frontiers, the 21st will be about adapting to greater limits on resource use. Oil, water and arable land are all finite resources, yet human demand for them is on a steady upward trajectory.

Consider oil. The concept of a coming peak in oil production is increasingly accepted even by mainstream organizations. The World Energy Council, for example, recently predicted that the peak of global oil production would arrive within 15 years -- this in a world whose energy demand, says the council, is projected to double by 2050.

Similarly, 47% of the world's population will live in areas of severe water stress by 2030, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Scarcity reveals itself through extreme and costly measures of supply: Desalination capacity globally is up by 45% in the last five years, with similar growth projected through 2012. On a local level, the government of Spain's Catalonia region declared last month that it would import water by boat and train to get through the summer.

This isn't just about human beings -- nature must have its cut of resources too. Water, for example, is vital to wildlife and healthy ecosystems, not just farms and factories. And the atmosphere needs carbon-free space to provide a stable climate. Nature's demands, more apparent and more insistent in a full world, add to our resource scarcity.

Scarcity does indeed raise prices and stimulate efficiency improvements or a shift to substitutes for scarce items. Already we see the use of hybrid vehicles, compact fluorescent lightbulbs and myriad other efficiency measures flourishing in our economy. Biofuels are increasingly used in place of gasoline. But the efficiency and substitution strategies have their limits.

Greater efficiency often carries a rebound effect: Efficiency can reduce consumption and lower prices, which can stimulate even greater demand. U.S. economic output per cubic meter of water used increased 2.6 times between 1960 and 2000 because of efficiency gains, and the same story holds for energy use. But scarcity of water and U.S. oil increased anyway, as a growing population demanded more overall of each resource.

The vital resources in short supply today may have no easy substitutes. What will substitute for water, the essence of all life on this planet? What will substitute for rich land suitable for agriculture? What will have all the upsides of petroleum without its pollution and climate downsides?

We are a creative species that will adapt to scarcities -- even scarcities of fundamental resources. But this much is clear: The scarcities of oil, water and land are increasingly real.

Gary Gardner is a senior researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, where he is also co-director of the report, "2008 State of the World: Innovations for a Global Economy."
We've heard these doomsayers before

Gary,

Since the Industrial Revolution, the prices of oil, coal, foods, metals and timber have fallen drastically relative to wages. You propose that that 250-year "commodity holiday" has now come to an end and that we face a future of scarcity. That is bad news for Californians, who live their lives predicated on cheap gas, cheap food and abundant water.

However, before people abandon their suburban ranch houses and SUVs, they should note that history has not been kind to those many commodity Jeremiahs who have prophesied scarcity on the basis of commodity price spikes.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Discuss round one of this week's Dust-Up.

Comments will close after one week.
 
1. Before joining the Stalinists & the Catholic Church in proclaiming that Malthus was (is) wrong, one should actually read what the man actually said. You can start at the free online Economics Library http://www.econlib.org/library/malthus... First read the first edition of the Essay. Then read the sixth edition, to learn the substance of the issues. You shuld also read Greg Clark's book, which has a clear and correct version of early edition Malthus. For deeper reading you could read "The evolution of Malthus's thought" by Nathan Keyfitz. 1983.
Submitted by: Don
11:27 AM PDT, May 9, 2008
 
2. Corn ethanol promises unending energy, yet some energy experts say that producing it consumes as much energy as burning it releases. Which side is right? Since ethanol in 2006 was 3% of fuel, gasoline should use decrease correspondingly. But consumption has increased 1.4%/yr for the past five years. If ethanol had replaced gasoline, we should have seen a 1.6% decrease. The discrepancy might be explained if demand had spiked, but miles driven increased only 1.2% from 2005 to 2006. The only explanation is that distilling corn into ethanol uses as much energy as it offers. About 9/10 of the energy used in growing corn comes from oil and gas.
Submitted by: Bruce Bridgeman
2:53 PM PDT, May 8, 2008
 
3. Yes, we need to use our skills to find solutions. the problem is that the vast bulk of humanity lacks the skills to find solutions. What we can do though is set up and support a social framework where one person with a solution can rent or sell the solution to the population at large. Imagine someone in a town that few Americans have heard of coming up with a brand new method for illumination and then selling it to the rest of the people.
Submitted by: Michael Ejercito
9:04 AM PDT, May 8, 2008
 




Doyle McManus: On his overseas trip, the president was met with a lot less cheering and a lot more tough talk.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
Syfy Channel? Y o Y?
My television pretty much stays dark during the week, so it took until the...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
SuperFan, taking affinities further
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT