E-mail this story

Copyright this

Jon Healey correctly points out that the debate over intellectual-property theft is complex because we are often dealing with "non-real properties." These properties cost nearly nothing to produce, and an infinite number of people can use the same property at the same time. And yet, we still want to treat them as if they were "real" property.

By Dallas Weaver

February 20, 2008

Send to (as many as 50 e-mail addresses, separated by commas):

Send me a copy.

From:

200 characters remaining