2008 GG Quadster

If made legal, would you trade in your motorcycle for this or another four-wheeler?

From the Los Angeles Times

If you crash that into an SUV, you would most likely be badly hurt. The people in the SUV would be just fine. I say Legalize the quad, I am free to risk my own life.

george @ 3:38 AM PDT, May 16, 2008
75,000 bucks, keep it, its for the wealthy, don't forget us poor hicks out here...looking for anything under twenty grand and goes 100 miles to the gal!!!!

frank carter @ 4:48 PM PDT, May 15, 2008
I'm not questioning the worth of this particular machine, but when I first saw the picture I thought "At last, a cheap, gas-sipping litttle commuter buggy. When will they start making something we can replace our cars with for a typical L.A. commute? Mike

Mike Conboy @ 4:41 PM PDT, May 15, 2008
Different, interesting, and kind of a cool go-cart. Not very practical. Can buy quite a nice car for the same cabbage. I agree that it should not be street legal.

Al @ 1:11 PM PDT, May 15, 2008
Looks like a red lawn mower.

David @ 12:38 PM PDT, May 15, 2008
the reporter woman sounded stuck up with her last comment "and it isn't for the poor" could've gone without that last comment. Anyway great bike and I am going to buy one soon

John @ 12:35 PM PDT, May 14, 2008
The first automobiles were little more than a horse carriage with an engine bolted on to it. Likewise the first motorcycles were bicycles with an engine strapped to them. This really isn't like a bicycle with an engine. It is, as you've put it, "a car that [has] motorcycle controls." It's a very niche, though interesting, product.

Retro biker @ 11:28 PM PDT, May 13, 2008
I'm sorry.. I never got the "trike thing" and I sure don't get this 4 wheel contraption.I guess somebody's buying it. Geez....

Bones @ 8:49 PM PDT, May 13, 2008