Published Date: July 5, 2009

The painful side effects of Obama's healthcare reform
Opinion
There are warnings signs that the president and his allies are looking at government-run rationing of care for the oldest and sickest.

latimes.com
Editorial

The Supreme Court term just ended was marked by close rulings but also surprising consensus.


Opinion

The Republicans need a White House candidate with ideas, steadiness and the ability to unify. That's not Alaska's departing governor.


Opinion

The foodstuff was once viewed as unnatural and dangerous. Its rise to a global staple may tell us something about today's genetically modified crops.


Opinion

The debate over whether the 5-month-old plan is working is still a little premature, but that hasn't stopped economists and politicians from jumping into the fray. The most urgent reason: jobs.


Opinion

A free-market approach would move away from employer-provided insurance and increase competition among both insurers and health providers.


Opinion

She may remain a tabloid celebrity and darling of the Christian right, but her decision to resign as Alaska's governor means she's through as a presidential contender.


Opinion

A former NHS patient has some advice for Americans skeptical of single-payer, government-run healthcare: You'll get over it.


TOON-OP

Cartoonists Matt Davies, Tom Toles and Joel Pett offer some perspective on the news of the day.


Opinion

Single-payer. Insurance-based. Socialized medicine. Free-market reform. A lot of terms are flying in the debate over what shape healthcare reform should take in the U.S. Ask two people to tell you how it should be approached, and you'll get six answers. But at this stage in the process, it's important to put all ideas on the table. With that in mind, we present three viewpoints on what a new system should -- and shouldn't -- look like.