Advertisement

China seeks U.S. effort to boost dollar

Share

The United States and China today kick off talks in Washington that are expected to highlight Beijing’s unease about its massive holdings in federal bonds, Washington’s desire to reduce China’s reliance on exports and the need for both sides to reach consensus on tackling climate change.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner will lead the American side in the two-day U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue. It’s the latest in an increasingly high-level series of meetings between the two countries this year that could have significant bearing on the global economy and international environmental policy.

A week after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke outlined strategies to stave off inflation, Chinese State Councilor Dai Bingguo and Vice Premier Wang Qishan are expected to seek assurances that the dollar will remain strong and thus protect China’s record $801.5-billion holdings in U.S. Treasuries.

Advertisement

“As an important investor, China is deeply concerned about the U.S. economic situation and hopes the U.S. stimulus policy could make effective progress,” said Zhu Guangyao, China’s assistant finance minister, at a recent news conference.

China’s foreign reserves increased in the second quarter to an all-time high of $2.13 trillion. About 65% of that amount is estimated to be in U.S. dollars. The bump has been credited not to a rebound in exports but to the increased value of China’s non-dollar holdings and more incoming investment.

China has attracted more capital because of robust growth in the face of the current global downturn. Massive government stimulus and record bank lending expanded China’s economy by 7.9% in the last quarter.

But while Washington welcomes China’s recent success, there’s concern that it cannot be sustained unless Beijing reforms its economy toward more domestic consumption.

For years, China’s Treasury purchases financed America’s buying binge, which included Chinese exports. Beijing also helped make possible the low interest rates and loose credit that paved the way for the U.S. housing bubble.

Now that the U.S. has been hit by the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, American households are increasing their savings rate. The U.S. trade gap has narrowed to its lowest level since 1999. China can no longer rely on American consumers to buy enough Chinese exports to keep the Asian nation’s economy growing, officials say.

Advertisement

“Our message to the Chinese is going to be ‘If you want to achieve your growth objectives, you’re going to have to find a different way of doing it than through export-led growth,” said a senior Obama administration official briefing reporters about the talks.

This is not news to Chinese policymakers, who have tried to stimulate consumption through modest healthcare reforms and purchasing programs for autos and household appliances. Creating a social safety net is widely agreed to be one of the best ways to make ordinary Chinese secure enough to spend some of their savings.

But countering the progress is the fear of destabilizing unemployment. Beijing will not sacrifice its export sector because no better alternative has been identified to keep millions of migrant workers employed.

To move forward, China will need to modernize its service sector to keep more profits within its borders.

“The export sector still has to rely on [American] companies like Wal-Mart and UPS to sell their goods and for logistics,” said He Fan, an international finance scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Although leaders on both sides have been stressing the importance of cooperation, Chinese leaders have not been shy lately about expressing concern about the dollar’s dominance. China has introduced about $95 billion in currency swaps with other countries since December and floated the idea of an international currency for trade. The moves signal a sharper tone out of Beijing.

Advertisement

Nicholas R. Lardy, a China expert at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, said American officials used to lecture the Chinese on how things ought to be and what they should do to open up financial markets.

But with U.S. economic power damaged by the financial crisis, Lardy said the Chinese “are taking a more aggressive posture and are not willing to be lectured to. . . . Now they are emboldened to do some lecturing.”

In recent economic talks, Americans had often focused on the Chinese currency, pressing Beijing to let the undervalued yuan rise against the dollar to reduce the price advantage of Chinese exports and boost sales of U.S. goods to China.

The pressure had some success from mid-2005 to mid-2008 as the yuan appreciated. But since then China has held the value of the yuan steady against the dollar.

Still, Lardy doesn’t see U.S. officials pressing the Chinese as hard on this issue as they did before. He said China’s massive holdings of U.S. debt would hang over the dialogue, and noted that U.S. officials had been less critical of China leading up to the talks.

“Maybe it’s not in your self-interest to fight your banker,” Lardy said, noting that one-fourth of all foreign dollar holdings are in the hands of China. “I think it does give China leverage, even if it’s more political than hard leverage.”

Advertisement

Experts say China has no real alternative other than to park most of its foreign reserves in dollars. Its holdings in federal securities have risen 58% in the last 12 months. So long as Beijing wants to keep the yuan from naturally appreciating by being traded on the open market, it will need to rid itself of the greenbacks that keep piling up.

“There aren’t that many places you can invest such huge amounts without massively affecting prices” of commodities such as oil, said Clay Dube, associate director of the U.S.-China Institute at USC.

This latest summit also comes at a time when both sides have been trading barbs over protectionism. The U.S. wants China to sign a World Trade Organization agreement to open up government projects to foreign firms. China wants the U.S. to share more green technology. Both countries view innovation in cutting emissions as a major growth market.

“This can clearly be a win-win situation,” said He of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. “But if they only focus on their own interests, it will turn to lose-lose.”

The two sides still appear to be at loggerheads on what to do about climate change. China recently surpassed the U.S. as the world’s chief polluter, but together, the two countries are responsible for 42% of Earth’s emissions.

A climate change bill calling for caps on pollution has stalled in the U.S. Senate, probably awaiting signs of a similar commitment on the part of Beijing. The Chinese are reluctant to do so for fear of limiting their economic growth. They also believe that America should commit to greater reductions in emissions than those outlined in the bill.

Advertisement

An agreement between the two sides is essential, experts say, if there’s any hope for an international climate change treaty in Copenhagen in December.

--

david.pierson@latimes.com

don.lee@latimes.com

Advertisement