Opinion Editorial

Spy wars on Capitol Hill: Feinstein vs. the CIA

Some calming words from Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. may lower the political temperature of a confrontation between Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and the CIA. But Feinstein's allegation that the agency improperly searched Senate Intelligence Committee computers and tried to trigger a criminal investigation of committee staffers still calls for a thorough investigation by the Obama administration.

Moreover, President Obama needs to intervene personally to ensure that the public finally gets to see the document at the center of the controversy: a voluminous report by the committee on the CIA's detention and interrogation of suspected terrorists after 9/11, a policy that we already know involved waterboarding and other acts of torture.

On Wednesday, Holder commented on two issues that have been referred to the Justice Department for a possible criminal investigation: the search of Intelligence Committee computers by CIA employees and the allegation that committee staffers improperly accessed an internal CIA report about the detention and interrogation program. Holder said the department hadn't decided whether to pursue either.

In a speech on the Senate floor last week, Feinstein, the committee chair, criticized the CIA's former acting general counsel, Robert Eatinger, for referring the conduct of the staffers to the FBI for a possible criminal investigation, noting that Eatinger had been a lawyer in the unit that carried out the interrogation and detention program. She said she viewed the referral as "a potential effort to intimidate this staff."

In the same remarks, Feinstein accused the CIA of searching Senate computers containing not only agency documents but also the committee's notes. "I have grave concerns that the CIA search may well have violated the separation-of-powers principles," she said. Even if Holder decides that a criminal investigation of the CIA isn't warranted, someone in the executive branch needs to scrutinize the agency's conduct in this affair. The Intelligence Committee should be monitoring the CIA, not the other way around.

Feinstein's accusations were especially dramatic given her previously staunch support for the intelligence community, particularly in connection with the National Security Agency's electronic surveillance activities. But the senator also has been a critic of the detention and interrogation program, and presided over an investigation that resulted in the 6,300-page report approved by the Intelligence Committee on a mostly party-line vote in December 2012.

Those who have read the report describe it as a blistering indictment that concludes the CIA's notorious "enhanced interrogation techniques" yielded little valuable intelligence. The agency, however, has claimed that the report contains "significant errors," and it seems content for it to remain under wraps. It's long past time that the report was declassified and released so the public can draw its own conclusions. Obama, who has said he is committed to declassifying the report, can and must make that happen.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Obama's NSA reforms: A significant step
    Obama's NSA reforms: A significant step

    The president's plan for reining in secret surveillance is a good start, but Congress should consider an even broader question.

  • Just as oil starts to lose its grip, the Saudis' low prices pull us back
    Just as oil starts to lose its grip, the Saudis' low prices pull us back

    To maintain their dominance of energy markets, suppliers of traditional carbon-based energy have never been afraid to play hardball. Massive advertising campaigns and intense congressional lobbying, built on huge levels of campaign finance, are routine in the United States. Now speculation is...

  • 2016's field of Republican dreams
    2016's field of Republican dreams

    Seemingly every Republican who has held high office in the last two decades is eager to jump into the presidential race. Whether it's the new guys, such as Sens. Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Rand Paul and Govs. Chris Christie and Scott Walker, or old-timers who haven't held office in years, such...

  • For Angelenos, there's much to decide before the March election
    For Angelenos, there's much to decide before the March election

    Election day is a month away. Again, you ask? Didn't we just have an election? Well, yes, we did. We voted for governor and Congress and other offices — and decided a handful of ballot measures — on Nov. 4. Now Los Angeles residents are being asked to vote again, on March 3, for...

  • LAUSD debate no-shows are a disservice to voters
    LAUSD debate no-shows are a disservice to voters

    It's not a big deal for a local political candidate to skip a debate or two during a campaign. But the last-minute disintegration of a planned three-man debate last Wednesday was another matter.

  • Football and the inspiration to be brave
    Football and the inspiration to be brave

    The Super Bowl is here, and those of us who have been watching the NFL from day one of the season are looking forward to a good game. We're also facing truckloads of criticism for being fans. We'll be called brutes and bullies and layabouts and plenty of worse things. Can we answer these...

Comments
Loading